Elke U. Weber - Publications

Publications

Here you find a list of journal articles and book chapters arranged either chronologically (starting with the most recent ones) or by topic (starting with my earliest research topics). This is followed by a list of my books and project reports.

By Topic

Journal Articles and Book Chapters
(* indicates co-authors who are students or postdocs)

Behavioral Finance / Investor Decisions

⁽¹²⁵⁾ Weber, M., & Weber E. U., & Nosić, A. (2013). Determinants of changes in investor risk taking. Review of Finance, 17, 847-883 (listed on 12/30/2010 as SSRN’s Top Ten download for ERN: Search; Learning; Information Costs & Specific Knowledge; Expectation & Speculations Top Ten).
View PDF

⁽⁷⁰⁾ Weber, E.U., Siebenmorgen, N., Weber, M. (2005). Communicating asset risk: How name recognition and the format of historic volatility information affect risk perception and investment decisions. Risk Analysis, 25, 597-609. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00627.x.
View PDF

Climate Change Policy

⁽²⁰¹⁾ Chapin, F.S., Weber, E.U., Bennett, E.M., Biggs, R., van den Bergh, J., Adger, N., Crépin, A.S., Polasky, S., Folke, C., Scheffer, M., Segerson, K., Anderies, J.M., Barrett, S., Cardenas, J.C., Carpenter, S., Fischer, J., Kautsky, N., Levin, S.A., Shogren, J.F., Walker, B., Wilen, J., de Zeeuw, A. (2022). Earth stewardship: Shaping sustainable futures through interacting policy and norm shifts. Ambio.
View PDF

⁽¹⁹⁴⁾ Levin, S.A., Anderies, J.M., Adger, N., Barrett, S., Bennett, E.M., Biggs, R., Cardenas, J.C., Carpenter, S., Crépin, A.S., Dixit, A., Ehrlich, P., Fischer, J., Folke, C., Kautsky, N., Nyborg, K., Polasky, S., Scheffer, M., Segerson, K., Shogren, J.F., van den Bergh, J., Walker, B., Weber, E.U., Wilen, J. (2021). Governance in the Face of Extreme Events: Lessons from Evolutionary Processes for Structuring Interventions and the Need to Go Beyond. Ecosystems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-021-00680-2
View PDF

⁽¹⁹²⁾ Sparkman, G.*, Attari, S.*, & Weber, E.U. (2021). Moderating spillover: Focusing on personal sustainable behavior rarely hinders and can boost climate policy support. Energy Research & Social Science, 78.
View PDF

⁽¹⁸⁹⁾ Pianta, S. *, Rinscheid, A. *, & Weber, E.U. (2021). Carbon capture and storage in the United States: Perceptions, preferences, and lessons for policy. Energy Policy, 151.
View PDF

⁽¹⁸⁷⁾ Forster, H.A. *, Kunreuther, H., & Weber, E.U. (2021). Planet or pocketbook? Environmental motives complement financial motives for energy efficiency across the political spectrum in the United States. Energy Research and Social Science, 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.101938
View PDF

⁽¹⁸⁶⁾ Weber, E. U. (2020). Seeing is believing: Understanding and aiding human responses to global climate change. Daedalus, Fall issue on “Witnessing Professionals and Climate Change.” www.amacad.org

⁽¹⁸³⁾ Rinscheid, A., Pianta, S., & Weber, E.U. (2020). What shapes citizens’ preferences towards climate change policies? The role of social norms and elite cues. Behavioural Public Policy, Published online by Cambridge University Press, 3 November 2020. doi:10.1017/bpp.2020.43
View PDF

⁽¹⁸²⁾ Rinscheid, A., Pianta, S., & Weber, E. U. (2020). Fast track or Slo-Mo? Public support and temporal preferences for phasing out fossil fuel cars in the United States. Climate Policy, 20, 30-45. DOI
View PDF

⁽¹⁷⁵⁾ Weber, E.U. (2019). Cognitive science of political thought: Some final reflections. Cognition, 188, 140.

⁽¹⁷³⁾ Attari, S.M.,* Krantz, D.H., & Weber, E. U. (2019). Statements about climate researchers’ carbon footprints affect their audiences’ policy support. Climatic Change, 154, 529–545. DOI.

⁽¹⁷¹⁾ Creutzig, F., Roy, J., Lamb, W.F., Azevedo, I.M.L., Bruine de Bruin, W., Dalkmann, H., Edelenbosch, O.Y., Geels, F.W., Grübler, A., Hepburn, C., Hertwich, E., Khosla, R., Mattauch, L., Minx, J.C., Ramakrishnan, A., Rao, N., Steinberger, J., Tavoni, M., Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Weber, E.U. (2018) Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change. Nature Climate Change, 8, 260-263.

⁽¹⁶⁹⁾ Weber, E.U. (2018). Perception matters: The pitfalls of misperceiving psychological barriers to climate policy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 508-511. DOI

⁽¹⁶⁶⁾ Bosetti, V., Weber, E.U., Berger, L., Budescu, D., Liu, N., & Tavoni, M. (2017). COP21 climate negotiators’ responses to climate model forecasts. Nature Climate Change, 7, 185-191. (Featured as discussed article in same journal issue: www.nature.com
View PDF

⁽¹⁶⁵⁾ Weber, E.U. (2017). Breaking cognitive barriers to a sustainable future. Nature Human Behavior (published online 1/16/2017: www.nature.com

⁽¹⁵⁰⁾ Attari, S.M.,* Krantz, D.H., & Weber, E.U. (2016). Statements about climate researchers’ carbon footprints affect their credibility and the impact of their advice. Climatic Change, 138, 325–338. View PDF

⁽¹³⁹⁾ Kunreuther H., S. Gupta, V. Bosetti, R. Cooke, V. Dutt, M. Ha-Duong, H. Held, J. Llanes-Regueiro, A. Patt, E. Shittu, and E.U. Weber. (2014). Integrated risk and uncertainty assessment of climate change response policies. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel and J. C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA. View PDF

⁽¹³³⁾ Patt, A. & Weber, E.U. (2014). Perceptions and communication strategies for the many uncertainties relevant for climate policy. WIREs: Climate Change, 5, 219-232 (one of the top cited articles contributing to WIRE’s 2015 2-Year Impact Factor: www.wires.wiley.com). View PDF

⁽¹¹⁹⁾ Weber, E.U. (2013). Doing the right thing willingly: Behavioral decision theory and environmental policy. In E. Shafir (Ed), The Behavioral Foundations of Policy, (pp. 380-397). Princeton University Press.
View PDF

Weber, E.U. & Johnson, E.J. (2012). Psychology and Behavioral Economics Lessons for the Design of a Green Growth Strategy. White Paper for Green Growth Knowledge Platform (OECD, UNEP, World Bank).
View PDF

⁽¹⁰⁶⁾ Swim, J., Stern, P., Doherty, T., Clayton, S., Reser, J.P., Weber, E.U., Gifford, R., & Howard, G.S. (2011). Psychological contributions to understanding and addressing global climate change. American Psychologist, 66, 241-250. doi: 10.1037/a0023220.
View PDF

Task Force on the Interface between Psychology and Global Climate Change (2009). Psychology and Global Climate Change: Addressing a Multi-faceted Phenomenon and a Set of Challenges. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
View PDF

National Research Council Report, Completing the Forecast: Characterizing and Communicating Uncertainty for Better Decisions using Weather and Climate Forecasts, Cutler, P. & Ban, R. (Eds.), (2006), Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Research Council Report, Making Climate Forecasts Matter, Stern, P. C., & Easterling, W. E. (Eds.), (1999), Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Choice Architecture

⁽¹⁷⁶⁾ Jachimowicz, J. M.,* Duncan, S.*, Johnson, E. J., & Weber, E.U. (2019). When and why defaults influence how people decide: A meta-analysis of default effects. Behavioral Public Policy. Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 January 2019. DOI. (SSRN’s Top Ten download list for: Cognitive Social Science eJournal, 4/12/2016, Behavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal, 3/19/2016, 4/3/2016, Social Responsibility of Business eJournals. 3/7/2016, Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets eJournal, 3/6/2016, CSN: Economics (Topic), 2/17/2016, Behavioral & Experimental Economics eJournal, Behavioral & Experimental Finance (Editor’s Choice) eJournal, Consumer Social Responsibility eJournal, ERN: Behavioral Finance (Microeconomics) (Topic), ERN: Experimental Economics (Topic) and SRPN: Consumer Behavior Issues (Topic), 2/16/2016)

⁽¹⁷⁴⁾ Shealy, T.,* Klotz, L., Weber, E.U., Johnson, E.J., Bell, R.G. (2019). Bringing choice architecture to architecture and engineering decisions: How the redesign of rating systems can improve sustainability. Journal of Management in Engineering, 35(4), [04019014]. DOI

⁽¹⁷²⁾ Bang, M.H.,* Shu, S.B.. & Weber, E.U. (2018). Informed Consent to Choice Architecture: The Role of Perceived Effectiveness on Acceptability. Behavioural Public Policy. Published online: 06 February 2018, pp. 1-21: DOI

⁽¹⁶⁹⁾ Klotz, L., Weber, E.U., Johnson, E.J., Shealy, T.,* Hernandez, M., & Gordon, M. (2018). Beyond rationality in engineering design for sustainability. Nature Sustainability, 1, 225-233.

⁽¹⁶⁰⁾ Yoeli, E., Budescu, D.V., Carrico, A.R., Delmas, M.A., DeShazo, J.R., Ferraro, P.J., Forster, H.A.,* Kunreuther, H., Larrick, R.P., Lubell, M., Markowitz, E.M., Tonn, T., Vandenbergh, M.P. & Weber, E.U. (2017). Behavioral science tools for energy and environmental policy. Behavioral Science and Policy, 3, 69–79.
View PDF

⁽¹⁵⁹⁾ Ungemach, C.,* Camilleri, A.R.,* Johnson, E.J., Larrick, R.P., & Weber, E.U. (2017). Translated attributes as choice architecture: Aligning objectives and choices through decision signposts. Management Science, Published Online: March 23, 2017 (listed on 3/31/2017 as SSRN’s Top Ten download list for ERN: Other Microeconomics: Intertemporal Consumer Choice & Savings Top Ten.
View PDF

Brief of Scholars of Behavioral Economics as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners, Expression Hair Design v. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General of the State of New York, Supreme Court of the United States (No. 15-1391, 2016).

⁽¹⁵⁴⁾ Shealy, T.,* Klotz, L., Weber, E.U., Bell, R.G., Johnson, E.J. (2016). Using framing effects to inform more sustainable infrastructure design decisions. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142, 1-9. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001152. View PDF

⁽¹⁴³⁾ Zaval, L.,* Markowitz, E.M., & Weber, E.U. (2015). How will I be remembered? Conserving the environment for legacy’s sake. Psychological Science, 26, 231-236. View PDF

⁽¹³⁶⁾ Kunreuther, H., & Weber, E.U. (2014). Aiding decision making to reduce the impacts of climate change. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37, 397-411 (listed on 1/10/2014 as SSRN’s Top Ten download list for PSN: Global Warming & Climate Change Top Ten, on 1/11/2014 for CSN: General Cognitive Social Science (Topic), SRPN: Architecture Top Ten, SRPN: Green Investment Top Ten and SRPN: Other Sustainable Technology Top Ten, on 1/17/2014 for SRPN: Energy Politics Top Ten, on 2/4/2014 for Environmental Economics eJournal Top Ten and Political Economy – Development: Environment eJournal Top Ten, on 2/12/2014 for Built Environment eJournal Top Ten, on 2/27/2014 for Political Economy – Development: Environment eJournal Top Ten and Politics & Energy eJournal Top Ten). View PDF

⁽¹³⁰⁾ Hershfield, H.E., Bang, H.M.,* & Weber, E.U. (2014). National differences in environmental concern and performance predicted by country age. Psychological Science, 25, 152-160. View PDF

⁽¹²⁰⁾ Dietz, T., Stern, P., & Weber, E.U. (2013). Reducing carbon-based energy consumption through changes in household behavior. Daedalus, 142, 1-12 (listed on 08/10/2013 as SSRN’s Top Ten download for PSN: Environment Top Ten, SRPN: Carbon Reduction Top Ten and SRPN: Consumer Behavior Issues Top Ten, on 08/11/2013 as SSRN’s Top Ten download for Consumer Social Responsibility eJournal Top Ten, and on /8/12/2013 as SSRN’s Top Ten download for Environmental Economics eJournal Top Ten).
View PDF

⁽¹¹⁸⁾ Johnson, E.J., Shu, S.B., Dellaert, B.G.C., Fox, C., Goldstein, D.G., Haeubl, G., Larrick, R.P., Payne, J.W., Schkade, D., Wansink, B., & Weber, E.U. (2012). Beyond nudges: Tools of a choice architecture. Marketing Letters, 23, 487-504 (listed on 08/13/2013 as SSRN’s Top Ten download for Consumer Social Responsibility eJournal Top Ten and SRPN: Consumer Behavior Issues Top Ten.
View PDF

⁽¹⁰⁴⁾ Ancker J,* Weber E.U., Kukafka R. (2011). Effects of interactive graphics on risk perceptions and decisions. Medical Decision Making, 31, 130-142. doi: 10.1177/0272989×10364847.
View PDF

⁽¹⁰³⁾ Ancker J.,* Weber E.U., Kukafka R. (2011). Effect of arrangement of stick figures on estimates of proportion in risk graphics. Medical Decision Making, 31, 143-150. doi: 10.1177/0272989×10369006.
View PDF

Hansen, J., Marx, S., Weber, E. U. (2004). The Role of Climate Perceptions, Expectations, and Forecasts in Farmer Decision Making: The Argentine Pampas and South Florida. International Research Institute for Climate Prediction (IRI), Palisades, NY: Technical Report 04-01.

Decision Modes / Decisions from Experience

⁽²¹⁶⁾ Constantino, S.M., Cooperman, A.D., Keohane, R.O., & Weber, E.U. (2022). Personal hardship narrows the partisan gap in COVID-19 and climate change responses. PNAS, 119 (46) e2120653119 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120653119 www.pnas.org

⁽²¹¹⁾ Sisco, M.R.* & Weber, E.U. (2022). Local temperature anomalies increase climate policy interest and support: Analysis of internet searches and US congressional vote shares. Global Environmental Change 76, 102572.

⁽²⁰⁰⁾ Reeck, C.,* Gamma, K.,* & Weber, E.U. (2022). How we decide shapes what we choose: Decision modes predict consumer decisions about environmentally-friendly electrical utility rates and plans. In press, Theory and Decision.
View PDF

⁽¹²⁷⁾ Weber, E.U. (2013). Seeing is believing. Nature Climate Change, 3, 312-313.
View PDF

⁽¹¹⁶⁾ Krosch, A.,* Figner, B.,* & Weber, E.U. (2012). Choice processes and their consequences in morally conflicting military decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 224-234.
View PDF

⁽¹⁰⁹⁾ Weber, E.U. (2011). Climate change hits home. Nature Climate Change, 1, 25-26. doi:10.1038/nclimate1070.
View PDF

⁽⁸⁰⁾ Lubell, M., Engel, C., Glimcher, P., Hastie, R., Rachlinski, J., Rockenbach, B., Selten, R., Singer, T., & Weber, E.U. (2008). Institutional Design Capitalizing on the Intuitive Nature of Decision Making. In: Engel, C. & Singer, W. (Eds.), Better than Conscious: Implications for Performance and Institutional Analysis (pp. 413-432). Boston MA: MIT Press.
View PDF

⁽⁷⁷⁾ Weber, E.U. & Lindemann, P.G.* (2007). From intuition to analysis: Making decisions with our head, our heart, or by the book. In: H. Plessner, C. Betsch & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 191-208). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
View PDF

⁽⁷⁶⁾ Engel, C., & Weber, E.U. (2007). The impact of institutions on the decision of how to decide. Journal of Institutional Economics, 3, 323-349. doi: 10.1017/S1744137407000744.
View PDF

⁽⁷⁴⁾ Marx, S.M., Weber, E.U., Orlove, B.S., Leiserowitz, A., Krantz, D.H., Roncoli, C., Phillips, J. (2007). Communication and mental processes: Experiential and analytic processing of uncertain climate information. Global Environmental Change, 17, 47-58.
View PDF

⁽⁷³⁾ Weber, E.U. (2006). Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic Change, 77, 103-120. doi: 10.1007/s10584-006-9060-3.
View PDF

⁽⁶⁷⁾ Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U., & Erev, I. (2006). Rare risky prospects: Different when valued through a window of sampled experiences. In K. Fiedler & P. Juslin (Eds.), Information sampling as a key to understanding adaptive cognition in an uncertain environment. (pp. 72-91). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Ancker, J. S. & Weber, E. U. (2005). Moral and ethical decision making: A review. Report for Defence R&D Canada, Toronto. Center for the Decision Sciences, Columbia University.

⁽⁶⁶⁾ Weber, E.U. & Ancker, J.S.* (2005). Towards a taxonomy of modes of moral decision making. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 563-564. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X05440091.
View PDF

⁽⁶⁵⁾ Weber, E.U., Ames, D., & Blais, A.-R. * (2005). How do I choose thee? Let me count the ways: A textual analysis of similarities and differences in modes of decision making in China and the United States. Management and Organization Review, 1, 87-118 (listed on 4/14/2008 as SSRN’s Top Ten download PA: Decision Theory) Top Ten. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8784.2004.00005.x.
View PDF

⁽⁶²⁾ Weber, E. U., Shafir, S., & Blais, A.-R.* (2004). Predicting risk-sensitivity in humans and lower animals: Risk as variance or coefficient of variation. Psychological Review, 111, 430-445. doi: 10.1037/0033-295×.111.2.430.
View PDF

⁽⁶⁰⁾ Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E.U., & Erev, I. (2004). Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events. Psychological Science, 15, 534-539. (Editor’s Choice for “Highlights of the Recent Literature” in Science, 305, 452; see http://www.sciencemag.org; listed on 12/28/2009 as SSRN’s Top Ten download ERN: Other Microeconomics: Decision-Making under Risk & Uncertainty (Topic)) doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00715.x.
View PDF

⁽⁵³⁾ Loewenstein, G.F., Weber, E.U., Hsee, C.K., Welch, E. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267-286 (listed on 4/2/2008 as SSRN’s Number 2 on ALL TIME HITS for all papers in SSRN eLibrary, www.papers.ssrn.com, and as TOP 10 download for ORG Organizational Behavior Research Centers Papers Top Ten); reprinted in Behavioral Finance and Investment Management, Volume 2, 2011, Research Foundation Publications). doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267.
View PDF

⁽⁵⁰⁾ Weber, E.U., Böckenholt, U., Hilton, D.J., & Wallace, B. (2000). Confidence judgments as expressions of experienced decision conflict. Risk Decision and Policy, 5, 1-32.
View PDF

⁽³²⁾ Weber, E.U. & Kirsner, B.* (1996). Reasons for rank-dependent utility evaluation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14, 41-61. doi: 10.1023/A:1007769703493.
View PDF

DoSpeRT Scale

⁽²⁰³⁾ Frey, R.*, Duncan, S.M.*, & Weber, E.U. (2022). Towards a typology of risk preference: Four risk profiles describe two thirds of individuals in a large and diverse sample of the U.S. Population. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. doi:10.31234/osf.io/yjwr9
View PDF

⁽¹²³⁾ Markiewicz, L.,* & Weber, E.U. (2013). DOSPERT’s gambling risk-taking scale predicts excessive stock trading. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 14, 1-14.
View PDF

⁽⁷²⁾ Blais, A.-R.,* & Weber, E.U. (2006). A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 33-47.
View PDF

⁽⁶¹⁾ Johnson, J.G., Wilke, A., & Weber, E.U. (2004). Beyond a trait view of risk-taking: A domain-specific scale measuring risk perceptions, expected benefits, and perceived-risk attitude in German-speaking populations. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 35, 153-172.
View PDF

⁽⁵⁶⁾ Weber, E.U., Blais, A.-R.,* & Betz, N. (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 263-290 (listed on as SSRN’s Top Ten downloads for journal ERN: Econometric Modeling in Microeconomics (Topic), 2/20/2016; ERN: Econometric Modeling in Microeconomics (Topic), 3/5/2016; ERN: Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk & Uncertainty Top Ten and Risk, Regulation, & Policy eJournal Top Ten, 12/30/2010). doi: 10.1002/bdm.414.
View PDF

⁽⁵²⁾ Blais, A.-R.,* & Weber, E.U. (2001). Domain-specificity and gender differences in decision making. Risk Decision and Policy, 6, 47-69. doi: 10.1017/S1357530901000254.
View PDF

⁽³³⁾ Weber, E.U. & Milliman, R.* (1997). Perceived risk attitudes: Relating risk perception to risky choice. Management Science 43, 122-143 (Winner of INFORMS Decision Analysis Society 1999 Publication Award for Best Paper Published in Calendar Year 1997). doi: 10.1287/mnsc.43.2.123.
View PDF

Environmental Decisions / Sustainability / Cooperation

⁽²²⁹⁾ Weber, E.U. & Sparkman, G.* (in press). Sustainability and the environment. In: D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, E. Finkel, & W. Mendes (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, 6th edition.

⁽²²⁷⁾ Weber, E.U. & Constantino, S.M.* (2023). All hearts and minds on deck: Hope motivates climate action by linking the present and the future. Emotion Review, 15. journals.sagepub.com

⁽²²⁶⁾ Choquette-Levy, N., Wildemeersch, M., Santos, F.P., Levin, S.A., Oppenheimer, M., & Weber, E.U. Pro-social preferences improve climate risk management in subsistence farming communities. Nature Sustainability. www.researchsquare.com

⁽²²⁵⁾ Sparkman, G.* & Weber, E.U. (2023). Beyond the single norm: How social perceptions connect in a norm network. Frontiers in Social Psychology, 1:1302029. doi: 10.3389/frsps.2023.1302029. www.frontiersin.org

⁽²²⁴⁾ Levin, S.A. & Weber, E.U. (2023). Polarization and the psychology of collectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science. journals.sagepub.com

⁽²²³⁾ Composto, J.,* Constantino, S.M.* & Weber, E.U. (2023). Predictors and consequences of pro-environmental behavior at work. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, , 4 (2023) 100107, www.sciencedirect.com

⁽²¹⁸⁾ Walker, B., Crépin, A.S., Nyström, M., Anderies, J.M., Andersson, E., Elmqvist, T., Queiroz, C., Barrett, S., Bennett, E., Cardenas, J.C., Carpenter, S., Chapin, T., Daily, G., de Zeeuw, A., Fischer, J., Folke, C., Levin, S., Nyborg, K., Polasky, S., Segerson, K., Seto, K., Scheffer, M., Shogren, J., Tavoni, JA., van den Bergh, J., Weber, E.U., Wilen, J., Vincent, J. (2023). Response diversity as a sustainability strategy. Nature Sustainability, 6, 621–629. doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-01048-7 www.nature.com

⁽²¹⁷⁾ Sisco, M.R.,* Constantino, S.M.,* Gao, Y., Tavoni, M., Cooperman, A.D.,* Bosetti, V., & Weber, E.U. (2023). Examining evidence for a finite pool of worry and a finite pool of attention to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 78, 102622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102622 www.sciencedirect.com

⁽²¹⁴⁾ Yang, L., Constantino, S.M., Grenfell, B.T., Weber, E.U., Levin, S.A., Vasconcelos, V.V. (2022). Socio-cultural determinants of global mask-wearing behavior. PNAS, 119 (41) e2213525119, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2213525119 www.pnas.org

⁽²⁰⁹⁾ Sparkman, G.,* Geiger, N., Weber, E.U. (2022). Americans perceive a false social reality as they underestimate the popularity of climate policy support and climate concern by nearly half. In press, Nature Communications.

⁽²⁰⁸⁾ Constantino, S. M.*, Sparkman, G.*, Bicchieri, C., Centola, D., Kraft-Todd, G., Shell-Duncan, B., Vogt, S., Weber, E.U. (2022). From local change to societal patterns: A critical review and practical guide to harnessing social norms for climate action. In press, Psychological Science in the Public Interest.

⁽²⁰⁷⁾ Composto, J.* & Weber, E.U. (2022). A scoping review of behavioral interventions to reduce household energy demand. In press. Environmental Research Letters.
View PDF

⁽²⁰⁵⁾ Creutzig, F., Roy, J., Devine-Wright , P., Diaz-José, J., Geels, F., Gruebler, A., Maïzi, N., Masanet, E., Mulugetta, Y., Chioma, D.O., Perkins, P.E., Sanches Pereira, A., Weber, E.U. (2022). Demand, services, and social aspects of mitigation. In: Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [ (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA.
View PDF

⁽²⁰⁴⁾ Bosetti, V., Dennig, F., Liu, N., Tavoni, M., & Weber, E.U. (2022). Forward-looking belief elicitation enhances intergenerational beneficence. Environmental and Resource Economics. SSRN Working Paper 3648287 SSRN’s Top Ten download list for: AARN: Environmentalism (Sub-Topic), Consumer Social Responsibility eJournal, SRPN: Consumer Behavior Issues (Topic) and SRPN: Social Economics (Topic).
View PDF

⁽²⁰²⁾ Krueger, E.*, Constantino, S. M.*, Centeno, M. A., Elmqvist, T., Levin, S., Weber, E. U. (2022). Governing sustainable transformations of urban social-ecological-technological systems. npj Urban Sustainability. doi: 10.1038/s42949-022-00053-1.
View PDF

⁽²⁰¹⁾ Sisco, M.R.,* Pianta, S.,* Bosetti, V., & Weber, E.U. (2021). Global climate strikes sharply raise attention to climate change: Analysis of climate search behavior in 46 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology 75, 101-108.

⁽¹⁹⁹⁾ Constantino, S. M.*, & Weber, E. U. (2021). Decision-making under the deep uncertainty of climate change: The psychological and political agency of narratives. Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.11.001
View PDF

⁽¹⁹⁸⁾ Schneider, C.R.* & Weber, E.U. Motivating prosocial behavior by leveraging positive self-regard through values affirmation (2021). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, http://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12841
View PDF

⁽¹⁹⁶⁾ Bak-Coleman, J.B., Alfano, M. Barfuss,W., Bergstom, C.T., Van Bavel, J., Centeno, M., Couzin, I., Donges, JF., Galesic, M., Gersick, A., Jacquet, J., Kao, A., Patterson, T., Romanczuk, P., Rubenstein, D., Tombak, K., & Weber, E.U. (2021). Stewardship of global collective behavior. PNAS, 118, 27, e2025764118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2025764118
View PDF

⁽¹⁹⁵⁾ Folke, C., Polasky, S., Rockström, J., Galaz, V., Westley, F., Lamont, M., Scheffer, M., Österblom, H., Carpenter, S., Chapin III, F.S., Seto, K., Weber, E., Crona, B., Daily, G., Dasgupta, P., Gaffney, O., Gordon, L., Hoff, H., Levin, S., Lubchenco, J., Steffen, W., and Walker, B. (2021). Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere. Ambio, 50, 834–869.
View PDF

⁽¹⁹³⁾ van der Linden, S. & Weber, E.U. (2021). Editorial Overview: Can Behavioral Science Solve the Climate Crisis? Current Opinions in Behavioral Science.
View PDF

⁽¹⁹¹⁾ Constantino, S. M. *, Schlüter, M., Weber, E. U., Wijermans, N. (2021). Cognition and behavior in context: a framework and theories to explain natural resource use decisions in social‑ecological systems. Sustainability Science, 16, 1651–1671.
View PDF

⁽¹⁹⁰⁾ Constantino, S.M. *, Pianta, S. *, Rinscheid, A. *, Frey, R. *, & Weber, E.U. (2021). The source is the message: The impact of institutional signals on climate change-related norm perceptions and behaviors. Climatic Change, 166:35, 1-20, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03095-z
View PDF

⁽¹⁷⁷⁾ Klotz, L., Pickering, J., Schmidt, R., & Weber, E.U. (2019). Design for sustainability. Nature Sustainability. View PDF

⁽¹⁷⁴⁾ Shealy, T., Johnson, E., Weber, E., Klotz, L., Applegate, S., Ismael, D., & Bell, R. G. (2018). Providing descriptive norms during engineering design can encourage more sustainable infrastructure. Sustainable cities and society, 40, 182-188.

⁽¹⁶⁸⁾ Weber, E.U. (2018). Perception matters: The pitfalls of misperceiving psychological barriers to climate policy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 508-511. DOI

⁽¹⁶⁷⁾ van der Linden, S., Maibach, E., Cook, J. et al. Culture versus cognition is a false dilemma. Nature Climate Change, 7, 457 (2017). www.nature.com

⁽¹⁶⁵⁾ Weber, E.U. (2017). Breaking cognitive barriers to a sustainable future. Nature Human Behavior (published online 1/16/2017: www.nature.com

⁽¹⁶⁴⁾ Sisco, M.,* Bosetti, V., Weber, E.U. (2017). When do extreme weather events generate attention to climate change? Climatic Change, 143, 227–241 (listed on 9/20/2016 as SSRN’s Top Ten download list for: SRPN: Consumer Behavior Issues, on 9/25/16 for: Consumer Social Responsibility eJournal, on 10/6/2016 for PSN: Global Warming & Climate Change and SRPN: Sustainable Development, on 10/15/2016 for Political Economy – Development: Environment eJournal Top Ten, on 10/17/2016 for Socially Responsible Investment eJournal Top Ten, on 10/27/2016 for: Social Responsibility of Business eJournals, on 11/3/2016 for: ERN: Other Game Theory & Bargaining Theory).
View PDF

⁽¹⁵⁸⁾ Schneider, C.R.,* Zaval, L.,* Weber, E.U. & Markowitz, E.M. (2017). The influence of anticipated pride and guilt on environmental decision making. PLoS One, 12(11): e0188781. DOI

Bowman, T. (2016). Toward Consensus on the Climate Communication Challenge: Report from a Dialogue of Researchers and Practitioners. Bowman Change, Inc.
Read more

⁽¹⁵³⁾ Attari, S., M.,* Weber, E.U., & Krantz, D.H. (2016). Energy conservation goals: What people adopt, what they recommend, and why. Judgment and Decision Making, 11, 342-351. View PDF

⁽¹⁵²⁾ Weber, E.U. (2016). What shapes perceptions of climate change? New research since 2010. WIREs Climate Change, 7, 125-134. doi: 10.1002/wcc.377. (Top Ten accessed in 2016: www.wires.wiley.com). View PDF

⁽¹⁴⁷⁾ Weber, E.U. & Johnson, E.J. (2016). Can we think of the future? Cognitive barriers to future-oriented thinking. In: Messner, D., & Weinlich, S (Eds.), Global cooperation and the human factor (pp.139-154), New York, NY: Routledge. View PDF

⁽¹⁴⁵⁾ Weber, E.U. (2015). Climate change demands behavioral change: What are the challenges? Social Research: An International Quarterly, 82, 561-581. View PDF

⁽¹⁴³⁾ Zaval, L.,* Markowitz, E.M., & Weber, E.U. (2015). How will I be remembered? Conserving the environment for legacy’s sake. Psychological Science, 26, 231-236. View PDF

⁽¹⁴²⁾ Truelove, H.B., Carrico, A.R., Weber, E.U., Raimi, K.T., & Vandenbergh, M.P. (2014). Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework. Global Environmental Change, 29, 127-138. View PDF

⁽¹³⁷⁾ Zaval, L.,* Keenan, E.A.,* Johnson, E.J., & Weber, E.U. (2014). Understanding local warming: How warm days lead to increased belief in global warming. Nature Climate Change, 4, 143-147. View PDF

⁽¹³⁵⁾ Attari, S.,* M., Krantz, D.H., & Weber, E.U. (2014). Reasons for cooperation or defection in real-world social dilemmas. Judgment and Decision Making, 9, 316-334. View PDF

⁽¹³²⁾ Weber, E.U. (2013). Individual and collective behavior change. World Social Science Report 2013 Changing Global Environments, pp. 306-311.
View PDF

⁽¹²⁷⁾ Weber, E.U. (2013). Seeing is believing. Nature Climate Change, 3, 312-313.
View PDF

⁽¹¹²⁾ Marx, S., & Weber, E.U. (2012). Decision making under climate uncertainty: The power of understanding judgment and decision processes. In T. Dietz & D.C. Bidwell (Eds.), Climate change in the Great Lakes region: Navigating an uncertain future. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press (kisted on 08/13/2013, 08/19/2013, and 09/03/2013 as SSRN’s Top Ten download for Consumer Social Responsibility eJournal Top Ten, on 09/16/2013 as SSRN’s Top Ten list for: ERN: Behavioral Economics Top Ten, and on 08/15/2013 and on 9/13/2013 as SSRN’s Top Ten download for Environmental Economics eJournal Top Ten).
View PDF

⁽¹⁰⁹⁾ Weber, E.U. (2011). Climate change hits home. Nature Climate Change, 1, 25-26. doi:10.1038/nclimate1070.
View PDF

⁽¹⁰⁸⁾ Weber, E.U. & Stern, P. (2011). The American public’s understanding of climate change. American Psychologist, 66, 315-328. doi: 10.1037/a0023253
View PDF

⁽⁹⁹⁾ Weber, E.U. (2010). What shapes perceptions of climate change? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(3), 332-342. doi: 10.1002/wcc.41.
View PDF

⁽⁹⁵⁾ Hardisty, D.H.,* Johnson, E.J., & Weber, E.U. (2010). A dirty word or a dirty world? Attribute framing, political affiliation, and query theory. Psychological Science, 21, 86-92. doi: 10.1177/0956797609355572.
View PDF

⁽⁹¹⁾ Podestá, G.P., F. Bert, B. Rajagopalan, S. Apipattanavis, C. Laciana, E. Weber, W. Easterling, R. Katz, D. Letson and A. Menéndez. (2009). Decadal climate variability in the Argentine Pampas: regional impacts of plausible climate scenarios on agricultural systems. Climate Research, 40, 199-210. doi:10.3354/cr00807.
View PDF

⁽³⁷⁾ Weber, E.U. (1997). Perception and expectation of climate change: Precondition for economic and technological adaptation. In M. Bazerman, D. Messick, A. Tenbrunsel, & K. Wade-Benzoni (Eds.), Psychological Perspectives to Environmental and Ethical Issues in Management (pp. 314-341). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
View PDF

Individual Differences in Judgment and Choice / Developmental / Aging

⁽¹⁶²⁾ Schneider, C. R.,* Fehrenbacher, D. D. & Weber, E. U. (2017). Catch me if I fall: Cross-national differences in willingness to take financial risks as a function of social and state ‘cushioning‘. International Business Review, 26, 1023-1033. DOI.

⁽¹⁴⁶⁾ Figner, B.,* & Weber, E.U. (2015). Personality and risk taking. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, 17, 809-813. View PDF

⁽¹⁴⁴⁾ Van Duijvenvoorde, A.C.K., Huizenga, H.M., Somerville, L.H., Delgado, M., Powers, A., Weeda, W.D., Casey, B.J., Weber, E.U., & Figner, B. (2015). Neural correlates of expected risks and returns in risky choice across development. Journal of Neuroscience, 35 (4): 1549-1560; doi: 10.1523. View PDF

⁽¹⁴¹⁾ Zaval, L.,* Li, Y.,* Johnson, E. J., & Weber, E.U. (2015). Complementary contributions of fluid and crystallized intelligence to decision making across the life span. In: Aging and Decision Making: Empirical and Applied Perspectives (pp. 149-168) (Hess, T., Strough, J.N., Loeckenhoff, C., Eds.), Elsevier. View PDF

⁽¹²⁹⁾ Li, Y.,* Baldassi, M.,* Johnson, E.J., & Weber, E.U. (2013). Complementary cognitive competencies, economic decision making, and aging. Psychology and Aging, 28, 595-613. doi 10.1037/a0034172 (listed on 10/13/2013 as SSRN’s Top Ten download for Human Cognition in Evolution & Development eJournal Top Ten, MKTG: Consumer Decision Making & Search Top Ten, Neuroeconomics eJournal Top Ten, ORG: Other Decision Making, Organizational Behavior & Performance Top Ten and ORG: Rationality, Cognition, & Decision Making Top Ten, and on 10/18/2013 for MKTG Subject Matter eJournals Top Ten and MRN Marketing Network; Top Ten Decision Making, Organizational Behavior & Performance eJournal, 10/25/2013; Microeconomics: Intertemporal Consumer Choice & Savings eJournal, 10/27/2013 Microeconomics: Intertemporal Consumer Choice & Savings eJournal., 11/5/2013; ).
View PDF

⁽¹⁰⁵⁾ Figner, B.,* & Weber, E.U. (2011). Who takes risks, when, and why?: Determinants of risk taking. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 211-216. doi: 10.1177/0963721411415790.
View PDF

⁽¹⁰²⁾ Appelt, K.C.,* Milch, K.F.,* Handgraaf, M.J.J., & Weber, E.U. (2011). Decision Making Individual Differences Inventory (DMIDI) and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgment and decision-making research. Judgment and Decision Making. 6, 252-262.
View PDF

⁽⁸²⁾ Figner, B.,* Mackinlay, R. J., Wilkening F., & Weber, E.U. (2009). Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: Age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 709-730. doi: 10.1037/a0014983.
View PDF

⁽⁵⁵⁾ Weber, E.U. (2001). Personality and risk taking. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 11274-11276). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Limited.
View PDF

Intertemporal Choice

⁽²²⁷⁾ Weber, E.U. & Constantino, S.M.* (2023). All hearts and minds on deck: Hope motivates climate action by linking the present and the future. Emotion Review, 15. journals.sagepub.com

⁽¹⁸⁸⁾ Reeck, C. *, Figner, B. *, Weber, E.U., Steffener, J.,Krosch, A. *, Wager, T.D., & Johnson, E. J. (2021). Framing the future first: Medial temporal lobe activation discriminates delay and acceleration framing in intertemporal choice. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 14, 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000122.
View PDF

⁽¹⁶¹⁾ Jachimowicz, J. M.,*Chafik, S., Munrat, S., Prabhu, J., & Weber, E.U. (2017). Community trust reduces myopic decisions in low-income individuals. PNAS, 114, 5401–5406, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617395114. (SSRN’s Top Ten download list for: ERN: Intertemporal Choice & Discounting (Topic), PSN: Other Underdevelopment & Poverty (Topic), PSN: Rural & Agricultural Development (Topic), SRPN: Poverty (Topic), 12/2/16, Sustainability & Economics eJournal, 1/7/17, 1/10/17).
View PDF

⁽¹⁴⁸⁾ Foerde, K.,* Figner, B.,*Doll, B.B., Woyke, I.C., Kendall Braun, E., Weber, E.U. & Shohamy, D. (2016). Dopamine modulation of intertemporal decision-making: Evidence from Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28, 657-667. View PDF

⁽¹⁴⁰⁾ Li, Y.,* Johnson, E. J., & Weber, E.U., Enkavi, A.Z., Gao, J., & Zaval, L. (2014). Cognitive ability and knowledge predict real-world financial outcomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 112(1), 65-69. doi:10.1073/pnas.1413570112. View PDF

⁽¹³⁴⁾ Pinto, A., Steinglass, J.E., Greene, A.L.,Weber, E.U., Simpson H.B. (2014). Capacity to delay reward differentiates obsessive compulsive disorder and obsessive compulsive personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 75, 653-659. View PDF

⁽¹²⁸⁾ Gong, M.,* Krantz, D.H., & Weber, E.U. (2014). Why Chinese discount future financial and environmental gains but not losses more than Americans. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 49, 103-124. View PDF

⁽¹²⁶⁾ Lerner, J., Li, Y.,* & Weber, E.U. (2013). Sadder but not wiser: The myopia of misery. Psychological Science, 24, 72-79 (listed on 08/07/2013 as SSRN’s Top Ten download for ERN: Other Microeconomics: Intertemporal Consumer Choice & Savings Top Ten, and on 08/10/2013 as SSRN’s Top Ten download for Microeconomics: Intertemporal Consumer Choice & Savings eJournal Top Ten).
View PDF

⁽¹²²⁾ Hardisty, D., Appelt, K.C., & Weber, E.U. (2013). Good or bad, we want it now: Fixed-cost present bias for gains and losses explains magnitude asymmetries in intertemporal choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 348-361.
View PDF

⁽¹²¹⁾ Hardisty, D.,* Thompson, K.J.,* Krantz, D.H., & Weber, E.U. (2013). How to measure discount rates? An experimental comparison of three methods. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 8, 236-249.
View PDF

⁽¹¹⁰⁾ Appelt, K.C.,* Hardisty, D.,* & Weber, E.U. (2011). Asymmetric discounting of gains and losses: A Query Theory approach. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 43, 107-126. doi: 10.1007/s11166-011-9125-1.
View PDF

⁽⁸⁸⁾ Hardisty, D. H.,* & Weber, E.U. (2009). Discounting future green: Money vs. the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 3, 329-340 (listed on 10/01/2009 as SSRN’s Top Ten download for ERN: Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate (Topic) Top Ten Top Ten, and on 12/30/2010 as SSRN’s Top Ten download for ERN: Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate) Top Ten. doi: 10.1037/a0016433.
View PDF

⁽⁷⁵⁾ Weber, E. U., Johnson, E. J., Milch, K.,* Chang, H., Brodscholl, J.,* & Goldstein, D.* (2007). Asymmetric discounting in intertemporal choice: A query theory account. Psychological Science, 18, 516-523. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01932.
View PDF

Memory and Judgment and Choice

⁽²²⁵⁾ Sparkman, G.* & Weber, E.U. (2023). Beyond the single norm: How social perceptions connect in a norm network. Frontiers in Social Psychology, 1:1302029. doi: 10.3389/frsps.2023.1302029. www.frontiersin.org

⁽²¹⁵⁾ Hancock, P.I., Klotz, L., Shealy, T., Johnson, E.J., Weber, E.U., Stenger, K., Vuppuluri R. (2022). Framing to reduce present bias in infrastructure design intentions. iScience, 25, 3:103954, ISSN 2589-0042, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.103954. www.cell.com

⁽¹⁶⁸⁾ Weber. E.U. (2018). Combine and conquer: A paean to methodological pluralism. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7, 29-32.

⁽⁸⁷⁾ Weber, E.U. & Johnson, E.J. (2009). Mindful judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 53-86. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163633 (listed on SSRN’s Top Ten download for Philosophy of Action eJournal, 2/10/2016; PRN: Decision Theory (Topic, 1/29/2013; and Environmental Economics eJournal Top Ten, 8/15/2013.).
View PDF

⁽⁷¹⁾ Weber, E.U. & Johnson, E.J. (2006). Constructing preferences from memory. In: Lichtenstein, S. & Slovic, P., (Eds.), The Construction of Preference (pp. 397-410). New York NY: Cambridge University Press.
View PDF

⁽⁴⁸⁾ Windschitl, P.D., & Weber, E.U. (1999). The interpretation of ‘likely’ depends on context, but ‘70%’ is 70%, right? The influence of associative processes on perceived certainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1514-1533. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.6.1514.
View PDF

⁽³¹⁾ Weber, E.U., Goldstein, W.M., & Barlas, S.* (1995). And let us not forget memory: The role of memory processes and techniques in the study of judgment and choice. In J. R. Busemeyer, R. Hastie, D. L. Medin (Eds.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Volume 32. Decision Making from a Cognitive Perspective. (pp. 33-82). San Diego: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60307-2.
View PDF

⁽²⁹⁾ Goldstein, W.M. & Weber, E.U. (1995). Content and discontent: Indications and implications of domain specificity in preferential decision making. In J. R. Busemeyer, R. Hastie, D. L. Medin (Eds.) Decision Making from a Cognitive Perspective. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 32 (pp. 83-136). San Diego: Academic Press. Reprinted in W. M. Goldstein & R. M. Hogarth (Eds.), Research on judgment and decision making (pp. 566-6 17). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1997. doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60308-4.
View PDF

⁽²²⁾ Weber, E.U., Böckenholt, U., Hilton, D.J., & Wallace, B. (1993). Determinants of diagnostic hypothesis generation: Effects of information, base rates, and experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1151-1164 (listed on 12/30/2010 and on 06/10/2013 as SSRN’s Top Ten download for CSN: Theory Top Ten. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.19.5.1151.
View PDF

⁽¹⁷⁾ Weber, E.U., Goldstein, W.M., & Busemeyer, J.R. (1991). Beyond strategies: Implications of memory representation and memory processes for models of judgment and decision making. In W. F. Hockley and S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Relating Theory and Data: Essays on Human Memory in Honor of Bennet B. Murdock (pp. 75-100). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
View PDF

⁽¹²⁾ Weber, E.U. & Murdock, B.B. (1989). Priming in a distributed memory system: Implications for models of implicit memory. In S. Lewandowsky, J. C. Dunn, & K. Kirsner (Eds.), Implicit Memory: Theoretical Issues (pp. 87-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Frlbaum Associates.
View PDF

⁽⁸⁾ Weber, E.U. (1988). Expectation and variance of item resemblance distributions in a convolution -correlation model of distributed memory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 32, 1-43. doi: 10.1016/0022-2496(88)90036-3.
View PDF

Modeling Judgment and Choice

⁽²²⁰⁾ Weber, E.U., Constantino, S.M.*, & Schlüter, M. (2023). Embedding cognition: Judgment and choice in an interconnected and dynamic world. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 32, 328-336. doi.org/10.1177/096372142311592. journals.sagepub.com

⁽¹⁶⁸⁾ Weber. E.U. (2018). Combine and conquer: A paean to methodological pluralism. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7, 29-32.

⁽¹¹⁷⁾ Handgraaf, M.J.J., Schuette, P.,* Yoskowitz, N.A., Milch, K.F.,* Appelt, K.C.,* Weber, E.U. (2012). Web-conferencing as a viable method for group decision research, Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 659-668.
View PDF

⁽¹¹¹⁾ Bert F., G.P. Podestá, S. Rovere, A. Menéndez, M., North, E. Tatara, C. E. Laciana, E. Weber, and F. Ruiz Toranzo (2011). An agent-based model to simulate structural and land use changes in agricultural systems of the Argentine pampas. Ecological Modelling, 222, 3486-3499.

⁽⁹⁶⁾ Bert F., G.P. Podestá, S. Rovere, X. González, A. Menéndez, F. Ruiz Toranzo, M. Torrent, M. North, C. Macal, P. Sydelko, E.U. Weber, and D. Letson. (2010). Agent based simulation of recent changes in agricultural systems of the Argentine Pampas. Advances and Applications in Statistical Sciences, 2(2), 213-232.
View PDF

⁽⁹³⁾ Bert, F., G. P. Podestá, S. Rovere, M. North, A. Menéndez, C. Laciana, C. Macal, E.U. Weber and P. Sydelko. (2010). Agent-based Modeling of a Rental Market for Agricultural Land in the Argentine Pampas. Proceedings of the International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs), 2010 International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software “Modelling for Environment’s Sake”, David A. Swayne, Wanhong Yang, A. A. Voinov, A. Rizzoli, T. Filatova (Eds.). Ottawa, Canada.
View PDF

⁽⁹²⁾ Letson, D., Laciana, C.E., Bert, F., Weber, E.U., Katz, R.W., Gonzalez, X.I., & Podesta, G. (2009). Value of perfect ENSO phase predictions for agriculture: Evaluating the impact of land tenure and decision objectives. Climatic Change, 97, 145-170. doi: 10.1007/s10584-009-9600-8.
View PDF

⁽⁸⁷⁾ Weber, E.U. & Johnson, E. J. (2009). Mindful judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 53-86. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163633 (listed on SSRN’s Top Ten download for Philosophy of Action eJournal, 2/10/2016; PRN: Decision Theory (Topic, 1/29/2013; and Environmental Economics eJournal Top Ten, 8/15/2013.).
View PDF

⁽⁷⁹⁾ Podestá, G., Weber , E.U., Laciana, C., Bert, F., & Letson, D. (2008). Agricultural decision-making in the Argentine Pampas: Modeling the interaction between uncertain and complex environments and heterogeneous and complex decision makers. In: T. Kugler, J. C. Smith, T. Connolly,  Y.-J. Son (Eds.), Decision Modeling and Behavior in Uncertain and Complex Environments (pp. 57-76). Berlin: Springer.
View PDF

⁽⁷⁸⁾ Laciana, C.E., Weber, E.U. (2008). Correcting expected utility for comparisons between alternative outcomes: A unified parameterization of regret and disappointment. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 36, 1-17. doi: 10.1007/s11166-007-9027-4.
View PDF

⁽⁵⁷⁾ Shafir, S., Bechar, A., & Weber, E.U. (2003). Cognition-mediated coevolution: Context-dependent evaluations and sensitivity of pollinators to variability in nectar rewards. _Plant Systematics and Evolution, 238_,195-209. doi: 10.1007/s00606-003-0280-y.
View PDF

Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Stern P. C., Stonich, S., & Weber, E. U. (Eds.) (2002). The Drama of the Commons. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press.

Weber, E. U., Baron, J., & Loomes, G. (Eds.) (2001). Conflict and Tradeoffs in Decision Making. Cambridge University Press.

⁽⁴⁷⁾ Munier, B., Selten, R., Bouyssou, D., Bourgine, P., Day, R., Harvey, N., Hilton, D., Machina, M., Parker, Ph., Sterman, J., Weber, E. U., Wernerfelt, B., & Wensley, R. (1999). Bounded rationality modeling. Marketing Letters, 13, 103-135. doi: 10.1023/A:1008058417088 (Listed on SSRN’s Top Ten download list for: Université Paris-Dauphine Research Papers Series, 6/15/2015.)
View PDF

⁽⁴⁶⁾ Weber, E.U. (1999). Giving mathematical psychology away: Challenges and promises. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 43, 197-200. doi: 10.1006/jmps.1999.1255.
View PDF

⁽⁴³⁾ Weber, E.U. (1999). Commentary on “Analysis of Choice Expectations in Incomplete Scenarios.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 71-72. doi: 10.1023/A:1007811023785.
View PDF

⁽⁴²⁾ Weber, E.U. (1998). From performance to decision processes in 30 years: A history of OBHDP under Jim Naylor. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 209-222. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2811.
View PDF

⁽³⁵⁾ Weber, E.U. (1997). The utility of measuring and modeling perceived risk. In A. A. J. Marley (Ed.), Choice, Decision, and Measurement: Essays in Honor of R. Duncan Luce (pp. 45-57). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
View PDF

⁽³²⁾ Weber, E.U. & Kirsner, B.* (1996). Reasons for rank-dependent utility evaluation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14, 41-61. doi: 10.1023/A:1007769703493.
View PDF

⁽³⁰⁾ Mellers, B.A., Weber, E.U., Ordónez, L. D., & Cooke, A.D. (1995). Utility invariance despite labile preferences. In J. R. Busemeyer, R. Hastie, D. L. Medin (Eds.) Decision Making from a Cognitive Perspective. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 32 (pp. 22 1-246). San Diego: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60311-4.
View PDF

⁽²⁸⁾ Wakker, P., Erev, I., & Weber, E.U. (1994). Comonotonic independence: The critical test between classical and rank-dependent utility theories. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 9, 195-230 (listed on 12/30/2010 as SSRN’s Top Ten download for PSN: Experimental Design Top Ten. doi: 10.1007/BF01064200.
View PDF

⁽²⁶⁾ Weber, E.U. (1994). From subjective probabilities to decision weights: The effect of asymmetric loss functions on the evaluation of uncertain outcomes and events. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 228-242. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.228.
View PDF

⁽¹⁸⁾ Böckenholt, U. & Weber, E.U. (1992). Use of formal methods in medical decision making: A survey and analysis. Medical Decision Making, 12, 298-306. doi: 10.1177/0272989×9201200409.
View PDF

⁽¹⁶⁾ Weber, E.U. & Coskunoglu, O. (1990). Descriptive and prescriptive models for decision making: Implications for the development of decision aids. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 20, 310-317.
View PDF

⁽¹⁵⁾ Weber, E.U. & Hilton, D.J. (1990). Contextual effects in the interpretations of probability words: Perceived base rate and severity of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 781-789. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.16.4.781.
View PDF

⁽¹⁴⁾ Weber, E.U. & Bottom, W.P.* (1990). An empirical evaluation of the transitivity, monotonicity, accounting, and conjoint axioms for perceived risk. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 45, 253-275. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(90)90014-Z.
View PDF

⁽¹³⁾ Weber, E.U. & Bottom, W.P.* (1989). Axiomatic measures of perceived risk: Some tests and extensions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2, 113-131. doi: 10.1002/bdm.3960020205.
View PDF

⁽⁷⁾ Weber, E.U. (1988). A descriptive measure of risk. Acta Psychologica, 69, 185-203. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(88)90006-6.

⁽⁴⁾ Luce, R.D., & Weber, E.U. (1986). An axiomatic theory of conjoint, expected risk. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 30, 188-205. doi: 10.1016/0022-2496(86)90013-1.

⁽³⁾ Weber, E.U. (1985). Managing a low-incidence risk: The example of toxic shock syndrome. Risk Analysis, 5, 73-84. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1985.tb00153.x.

⁽²⁾ Weber, E.U. (1984). Combine and conquer: A joint application of conjoint and functional approaches to the problem of risk measurement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10, 179-194. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.10.2.179.

Neuroscience of Judgment and Choice / Neuroeconomics

⁽²²⁸⁾ Chung, H.K., Tobler, P.N., & Weber, E.U. (2024). Uncertainty coding in the reward system. In: Encyclopedia of the Human Brain, 2nd Edition, www.sciencedirect.com

⁽¹⁶³⁾ Enkavi, A.Z.,* Weber, B., Zweyer, I., Wagner, J., Elger, C.E., Weber, E.U., Johnson, E. J. (2017). Evidence for hippocampal dependence of value-based decisions. Scientific Reports, 7:17738, 1-9.

Kenning, P., Weber, E., & Welpe, I. (2014). Neuroeoconomics. Special Issue of Schmalenbach Business Research, 5/14.

⁽¹³⁸⁾ Kenning, P., Weber, E., & Welpe, I. (2014). The brain in business research, S_chmalenbach Business Research_, Special Issue 5/14, 1-6.

⁽¹²⁴⁾ Tobler, P. & Weber, E.U. (2014). Valuation for risky and uncertain choices. In: P. Glimcher & E. Fehr (Eds.), Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain , 2nd edition, (pp. 149-172). New York: Elsevier. View PDF

⁽¹¹⁵⁾ Steinglass, J., Figner, B.,* Berkowitz, S., Weber, E.U., Walsh, T. (2012). Increased capacity to delay reward in anorexia nervosa. Journal of International Neurological Society, 18, 1-8.
View PDF

⁽¹⁰⁰⁾ Weber, E.U. (2010). On the coefficient of variation as a predictor of risk sensitivity: Behavioral and neural evidence for the relative encoding of outcome variability. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54, 395-399. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2010.03.003.
View PDF

⁽⁹⁷⁾ Figner, B.,* Knoch, D., Johnson, E.J., Krosch, A.R.,* Lisanby, S. H., Fehr, E., and Weber, E.U. (2010). Lateral prefrontal cortex and self-control in intertemporal choice. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 538-539. doi:10.1038/nn.2516 (Listed on SSRN’s Top Ten download list for: CSN: Modeling & Simulation (Topic), 1/16/2017, BRN Cognitive Neuroscience (Biology) (Topic), 2/9/2017, 4/7/2017, 5/31/2017).
View PDF

⁽⁸³⁾ Weber, E.U., & Johnson, E.J. (2009). Decisions under uncertainty: Psychological, economic, and neuroeconomic explanations of risk preference. In: P. Glimcher, C. Camerer, E. Fehr, & R. Poldrack (Eds.), Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain (pp. 127-144). New York: Elsevier.
View PDF

Query Theory

⁽¹⁵⁷⁾ Majd, S.*, Conley, M.A., and Weber, E.U. (2017). Evidence of query theory as tool to assist restrained eaters. American Journal of Health Behaviors, 41 33-41.

⁽¹⁰⁷⁾ Weber, E.U., & Johnson, E. J. (2011). Query Theory: Knowing what we want by arguing with ourselves. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 91-92. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10002797.
View PDF

⁽⁹⁵⁾ Hardisty, D. H.,* Johnson, E.J., & Weber, E.U. (2010). A dirty word or a dirty world? Attribute framing, political affiliation, and query theory. Psychological Science, 21, 86-92. doi: 10.1177/0956797609355572.
View PDF

⁽⁷⁵⁾ Weber, E.U., Johnson, E.J., Milch, K.,* Chang, H., Brodscholl, J.,* & Goldstein, D.* (2007). Asymmetric discounting in intertemporal choice: A query theory account. Psychological Science, 18, 516-523. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01932.
View PDF

Risk Perception and Risky Choice

Weber, E. U. & Klement, J. (2018). Risk tolerance and circumstances. Research Foundation Brief for the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) Institute.
View PDF

Lloyd’s Register Foundation (2017). Foresight Review on the Public Understanding of Risk: Reconciling Facts and Fears (Report preparation coordinated by K.K. Phoon and E. U. Weber, with lead author J. Dennett-Thorpe).
Read more

⁽¹⁵⁸⁾ Schneider, C.R.,* Zaval, L.,* Weber, E.U. & Markowitz, E.M. (2017). The influence of anticipated pride and guilt on environmental decision making. PLoS One, 12(11): e0188781. DOI

⁽¹⁵⁶⁾ Weber, E.U. (2017). Understanding public risk perception and responses to changes in perceived risk. In: E.J. Balleisen, L. S. Bennear, K. D. Krawiec, & J. B. Wiener (Eds.), Policy Shock: Regulatory Responses to Oil Spills, Nuclear Accidents, and Financial Crashes, (pp. 82-106) Cambridge University Press. View PDF

⁽¹⁴⁹⁾ Fox-Glassman, K.,* & Weber, E.U. (2016). What makes risk acceptable? Revisiting the 1978 psychological dimensions of perceptions of technological risks. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 75, 157-169. View PDF

⁽¹⁴⁶⁾ Figner, B.,* & Weber, E.U. (2015). Personality and risk taking. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, 17, 809-813. View PDF

⁽¹³¹⁾ Gong, M., Heal, G., Krantz, D.H., Kunreuther, H., & Weber, E.U. (2014). The role of subsidies in coordination games with interconnected risk. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27, 395-407. View PDF

⁽¹²³⁾ Markiewicz, L.,* & Weber, E.U. (2013). DOSPERT’s gambling risk-taking scale predicts excessive stock trading. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 14, 1-14.
View PDF

⁽¹¹³⁾ Slovic, P. & Weber, E.U. (2013). Perception of risk posed by extreme events. SSRN Working Paper: Perception of Risk Posed by Extreme Events, and chapter in: Regulation of Toxic Substances and Hazardous Waste (2nd edition, 2011) (Applegate, Gabba, Laitos, and Sachs, Editors), Foundation Press, (listed on 08/26/2013 as SSRN’s Top Ten download for ERN: Other Game Theory & Bargaining Theory; Top Ten 9/20/2016 as Top Ten download list for: SRPN: Other Built Environment; on 2/24/2017 as Top Ten download list for: Built Environment eJournal).

⁽¹⁰¹⁾ Weber, E.U. & Ancker, J.S.* (2011). Cultural differences in risk taking and precaution: The relative roles of risk perception and risk attitude In J.B. Wiener, M.D. Rogers, P.H. Sand, and J.K. Hammitt (Eds.), The Reality of Precaution: Comparing Risk Regulation in the United States and Europe (pp. 480-491). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
View PDF

⁽⁹⁶⁾ Bert F., G.P. Podestá, S. Rovere, X. González, A. Menéndez, F. Ruiz Toranzo, M. Torrent, M. North, C. Macal, P. Sydelko, E. U. Weber, and D. Letson. (2010). Agent based simulation of recent changes in agricultural systems of the Argentine Pampas. Advances and Applications in Statistical Sciences, 2(2), 213-232.
View PDF

⁽⁹⁴⁾ Weber, E.U. (2010). Risk attitude and preference. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1, 79-88. doi: 10.1002/wcs.5
View PDF

⁽⁹²⁾ Letson, D., Laciana, C. E., Bert, F., Weber, E. U., Katz, R. W., Gonzalez, X. I., & Podesta, G. (2009). Value of perfect ENSO phase predictions for agriculture: Evaluating the impact of land tenure and decision objectives. Climatic Change, 97, 145-170. doi: 10.1007/s10584-009-9600-8.
View PDF

^(90)^Weber, E.U. (2009). Risk Attitudes. In Kattan, M.W. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Medical Decision Making (pp. 992-994). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

⁽⁸⁹⁾ Weber, E.U. (2009). Risk Perception. In Kattan, M.W. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Medical Decision Making (pp. 996-1001). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

⁽⁸²⁾ Figner, B.,* Mackinlay, R.J., Wilkening F., & Weber, E.U. (2009). Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: Age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 709-730. doi: 10.1037/a0014983.
View PDF

⁽⁶⁹⁾ Klos, A., Weber, E.U., & Weber, M. (2005). Risk perception and risk behavior in repeated gambles. Management Science, 51, 1777-1790 (listed on 12/30/2010 as SSRN’s Top Ten download for ERPN: Other Entrepreneurs (Finance)) Top Ten. Doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0429.
View PDF

⁽⁶⁴⁾ Weber, E.U. (2004). The role of risk perception in risk management decisions: Who’s afraid of a poor old-age? In O. S. Mitchell & S. P. Utkus (Eds.), Pension Design and Structure: New Lessons from Behavioral Finance. Part I. Research on Decision-Making Under Uncertainty (pp. 53-66). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
View PDF

⁽⁶³⁾ Weber, E.U. (2004). Perception Matters: Psychophysics for Economists. In J. Carrillo and I. Brocas (Eds.), Psychology and Economics (pp. 165-176). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
View PDF

⁽⁵⁴⁾ Weber, E.U. (2001). Decision and choice: Risk, empirical studies. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 13347-1335 1). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Limited.
View PDF

⁽⁴⁹⁾ Weber E.U., & Hsee, C.K. (1999). Models and mosaics: Investigating cross-cultural differences in risk perception and risk preference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 6, 611-617 (listed on 10/25/2008, 1/13/2010, and 2/2/2010 as SSRN’s Top Ten download for ORG Organizational Behavior Research Centers Papers Top Ten. doi: 10.3758/BF03212969.
View PDF

⁽⁴⁵⁾ Weber, E.U. (1999). Who’s afraid of a little risk? New evidence for general risk aversion. In J. Shanteau, B. A. Mellers, & D. Schum (Eds.), Decision Science and Technology: Reflections on the Contributions of Ward Edwards (pp. 53-64). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Press.
View PDF

⁽⁴⁴⁾ Hsee, C.K. & Weber, E.U. (1999). Cross-national differences in risk preference and lay predictions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 165-179. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199906)12:2<165::AID-BDM316>3.0.CO;2-N.
View PDF

⁽⁴¹⁾ Weber, E.U., Hsee, C.K., & Sokolowska, J. (1998). What folklore tells us about risk and risk taking: Cross-cultural comparisons of American, German, and Chinese proverbs. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75, 170-186 (listed on 9/13/2008 as SSRN’s Top Ten download for ORG Organizational Behavior Research Centers Papers Top Ten. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2788.
View PDF

⁽⁴⁰⁾ Weber, E.U. & Hsee, C.K. (1998). Cross-cultural differences in risk perception but cross-cultural similarities in attitudes towards risk. Management Science, 44, 1205-12 17. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.44.9.1205.
View PDF

⁽³⁸⁾ Bontempo, R.N.,* Bottom, W.P.,* & Weber, E.U. (1997). Cross-cultural differences in risk perception: A model-based approach. Risk Analysis, 17, 479-488. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00888.x.
View PDF

⁽³⁶⁾ Hsee, C.K. & Weber, E.U. (1997). A fundamental prediction error: Self-other discrepancies in risk preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 45-53. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.126.1.45.
View PDF

⁽³⁴⁾ Mellers, B.A., Schwartz, A., & Weber, E.U. (1997). Do risk attitudes reflect in the eye of the beholder? In A. A. J. Marley (Ed.), Choice, Decision, and Measurement: Essays in Honor of R. Duncan Luce (pp. 59-73). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
View PDF

⁽²⁴⁾ Holtgrave, D.* & Weber, E.U. (1993). Dimensions of risk perception for financial and health risks. Risk Analysis, 13, 553-558. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb00014.x.
View PDF

⁽²¹⁾ Weber, E.U., Anderson, C.,* & Birnbaum, M.H. (1992). A theory of perceived risk and attractiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 492-523. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(92)90030-B.
View PDF

⁽⁷⁾ Weber, E.U. (1988). A descriptive measure of risk. Acta Psychologica, 69, 185-203. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(88)90006-6.
View PDF

⁽⁴⁾ Luce, R.D., & Weber, E.U. (1986). An axiomatic theory of conjoint, expected risk. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 30, 188-205. doi: 10.1016/0022-2496(86)90013-1
View PDF

⁽³⁾ Weber, E.U. (1985). Managing a low-incidence risk: The example of toxic shock syndrome. Risk Analysis, 5, 73-84. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1985.tb00153.x
View PDF

Social and Cultural Processes in Judgment and Choice

⁽²²⁴⁾ Levin, S.A. & Weber, E.U. (2023). Polarization and the psychology of collectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science. journals.sagepub.com

⁽²²¹⁾ Majumdar, R.* & Weber, E.U. (2023). Multilevel intergroup conflict at the core of climate (in)justice: Psychological challenges and ways forward. WIREs Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.836 wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com

⁽²²⁰⁾ Weber, E.U., Constantino, S.M.*, & Schlüter, M. (2023). Embedding cognition: Judgment and choice in an interconnected and dynamic world. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 32, 328-336. doi.org/10.1177/096372142311592. journals.sagepub.com

⁽²¹⁹⁾ Caggiano, H., Constantino, S.M., Lees, J. M., Majumdar, R., Weber, E.U. (2023). Community-engaged research is best positioned to catalyze systemic change. Behavior and Brain Science.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X23001024. www.cambridge.org

⁽²⁰⁶⁾ Ehret, S., Constantino, S.M.*, Weber, E.U., Efferson, C., & Vogt, S. (2022). Group identities can undermine social tipping after intervention. In press, Nature Human Behavior.

⁽¹⁹⁷⁾ Vasconcelos, V. *, Constantino, S. *, Dannenberg, A., Lumkowsky, M., Weber, E.U., & Levin, S. (2021). Segregation and clustering of preferences erode socially beneficial coordination. PNAS, 118.

⁽¹⁸¹⁾ Jachimowicz, J. M.,* Szaszi, B., Prabhu, J., & Weber, E.U. (2020). Higher economic inequality intensifies the poor’s financial hardship by fraying the community buffer. Nature Human Behavior, 4 702-712.
View PDF

⁽¹⁷⁹⁾ Schneider, C. R., & Weber, E. U. (2020). Reducing Discrimination and Fostering Prosociality Towards Ex‐Prisoners in Nigeria and the United States. Journal of Social Issues, 76, 172-199. DOI
View PDF

⁽¹⁷⁸⁾ Sisco, M. R., & Weber, E. U. (2019). Examining charitable giving in real-world online donations. Nature Communications, 10. DOI
View PDF

⁽¹⁶⁷⁾ van der Linden, S., Maibach, E., Cook, J. et al. Culture versus cognition is a false dilemma. Nature Climate Change, 7, 457 (2017). www.nature.com

⁽¹⁵⁵⁾ Nyborg, K., J.M. Anderies, A. Dannenberg, T. Lindahl, C. Schill, M. Schlüter, W.N. Adger, K.J. Arrow, S. Barrett, S. Carpenter, F.S. Capin III, A.-S. Crépin, G. Daily, P. Ehrlich, C. Folke, W. Jager, N. Kautsky, S.A. Levin, S. Polasky, M. Scheffer, M. S. Taylor, B. Walker, E.U. Weber, J. Wilen, A. Xepapadeas, A. de Zeeuw. (2016). The non-smoking planet: How social norm changes can help solve global problems. Science, 354, 42-43. View PDF

⁽¹⁵¹⁾ Bouin, O., Djelic, M.L., Fleurbaey, M., Kanbur, R., Laborde, C., Nowotny, H., Reis, E., Weber, E., Zhang, X. (2016). International Panel on Social Progress seeks comments. Nature, 534, 616-617. View PDF

⁽¹³⁵⁾ Attari, S.,* M., Krantz, D.H., & Weber, E.U. (2014). Reasons for cooperation or defection in real-world social dilemmas. Judgment and Decision Making, 9, 316-334. View PDF

⁽¹¹⁴⁾ Ames, D.R., Weber, E.U., & Zou, X.* (2012). Mind-reading in strategic interaction: The impact of perceived similarity on projection and stereotyping. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 96-110.
View PDF

⁽⁹⁸⁾ Weber, E.U. & Morris, M.W. (2010). Culture and judgment and decision making: The constructivist turn. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 410-419. doi: 10.1177/1745691610375556 (Listed on SSRN’s Top Ten download list for: INTL: Social & Cultural Issues (Topic), 5/21/2015).
View PDF

⁽⁸⁴⁾ Milch, K.F.,* Appelt, K.C.,* Weber, E.U., Handgraaf, M.J.J., & Krantz, D. (2009). From individual preference construction to group decisions: Framing effects and group processes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 242-255. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.11.003.
View PDF

⁽⁸¹⁾ Weber, E.U. (2008). Comment on “Why women hunt: Risk and contemporary foraging in a Western desert aboriginal community.” Current Anthropology, 49, 685-686. doi: 10.1086/587700.
View PDF

⁽⁵⁸⁾ Ames, D.R.,* Flynn, F.J., & Weber, E.U. (2004). It’s the thought that counts: On perceiving how helpers decide to lend a hand Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 461-474. Winner of 2003 Best Paper Award, Academy of Management, Organizational Behavior Division. doi: 10.1177/0146167203261890.
View PDF

⁽⁵¹⁾ Weber, E.U., & Hsee, C.K. (2000). Culture and individual decision-making. Applied Psychology: An International Journal, 49, 32-61 (listed on 6/15/2008 as SSRN’s Top Ten downloads for QMM: Multimethod Designs Top Ten, on 10/25/2008 as SSRN’s Top Ten downloads for ORG Organizational Behavior Research Centers Papers Top Ten, on 04/06/2009 as SSRN’s Top Ten download for CPB: Political Psychology Top Ten, and on 12/30/2010 as SSRN’s Top Ten download for Political Behavior eJournals Top Ten, Political Behavior: Cognition, Psychology, & Behavior eJournal Top Ten and Political Methods eJournals Top Ten). doi: 10.1111/1464-0597.00005.
View PDF

Chronologically

Journal Articles and Book Chapters
(* indicates co-authors who are students or postdocs)

In press

⁽²²⁹⁾ Weber, E.U. & Sparkman, G.* (in press). Sustainability and the environment. In: D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, E. Finkel, & W. Mendes (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, 6th edition.

2023

⁽²²⁸⁾ Chung, H.K., Tobler, P.N., & Weber, E.U. (2024). Uncertainty coding in the reward system. In: Encyclopedia of the Human Brain, 2nd Edition, www.sciencedirect.com

⁽²²⁷⁾ Weber, E.U. & Constantino, S.M.* (2023). All hearts and minds on deck: Hope motivates climate action by linking the present and the future. Emotion Review, 15. journals.sagepub.com

⁽²²⁶⁾ Choquette-Levy, N., Wildemeersch, M., Santos, F.P., Levin, S.A., Oppenheimer, M., & Weber, E.U. Pro-social preferences improve climate risk management in subsistence farming communities. Nature Sustainability. www.researchsquare.com

⁽²²⁵⁾ Sparkman, G.* & Weber, E.U. (2023). Beyond the single norm: How social perceptions connect in a norm network. Frontiers in Social Psychology, 1:1302029. doi: 10.3389/frsps.2023.1302029. www.frontiersin.org

⁽²²⁴⁾ Levin, S.A. & Weber, E.U. (2023). Polarization and the psychology of collectives. Perspectives on Psychological Science. journals.sagepub.com

⁽²²³⁾ Composto, J.,* Constantino, S.M.* & Weber, E.U. (2023). Predictors and consequences of pro-environmental behavior at work. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, , 4 (2023) 100107, www.sciencedirect.com

⁽²²²⁾ Caggiano, H.* & Weber, E.U. (2023). Advances in qualitative methods in environmental research. In: Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 48. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-112321-080106 www.annualreviews.org

⁽²²¹⁾ Majumdar, R.* & Weber, E.U. (2023). Multilevel intergroup conflict at the core of climate (in)justice: Psychological challenges and ways forward. WIREs Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.836 wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com

⁽²²⁰⁾ Weber, E.U., Constantino, S.M.*, & Schlüter, M. (2023). Embedding cognition: Judgment and choice in an interconnected and dynamic world. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 32, 328-336. doi.org/10.1177/096372142311592. journals.sagepub.com

⁽²¹⁹⁾ Caggiano, H., Constantino, S.M., Lees, J. M., Majumdar, R., Weber, E.U. (2023). Community-engaged research is best positioned to catalyze systemic change. Behavior and Brain Science.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X23001024. www.cambridge.org

2022

⁽²¹³⁾ Sparkman, G.*, Geiger, N., Weber, E.U. (2022). Americans perceive a false social reality as they underestimate the popularity of climate policy support and climate concern by nearly half. Nature Communications, 13: 4779. doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32412-y www.nature.com

⁽²¹²⁾ Constantino, S. M.*, Sparkman, G.*, Bicchieri, C., Centola, D., Kraft-Todd, G., Shell-Duncan, B., Vogt, S., Weber, E.U. (2022). Scaling up change: A critical review and practical guide to harnessing social norms for climate action. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Volume 23, Issue 2, https://doi.org/10.1177/15291006221105279. journals.sagepub.com

²¹⁰⁾ Composto, J.* & Weber, E.U. (2022). A scoping review of behavioral interventions to reduce household energy demand. Environmental Research Letters, 17, 063005, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac71b8 iopscience.iop.org
View PDF

⁽²⁰⁹⁾ Ehret, S., Constantino, S.M.*, Weber, E.U., Efferson, C., & Vogt, S. (2022). Group identities can undermine social tipping after intervention. Nature Human Behavior, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01440-5 www.nature.com

⁽²⁰⁸⁾ Creutzig, F., Roy, J., Devine-Wright , P., Diaz-José, J., Geels, F., Gruebler, A., Maïzi, N., Masanet, E., Mulugetta, Y., Chioma, D.O., Perkins, P.E., Sanches Pereira, A., Weber, E.U. (2022). Demand, services, and social aspects of mitigation. In: IPCC, 2022: Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, R. Slade, A. Al Khourdajie, R. van Diemen, D. McCollum, M. Pathak, S. Some, P. Vyas, R. Fradera, M. Belkacemi, A. Hasija, G. Lisboa, S. Luz, J. Malley, (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA.

⁽²⁰⁷⁾ Creutzig, F., Roy, J., Devine-Wright , P., Diaz-José, J., Geels, F., Gruebler, A., Maïzi, N., Masanet, E., Mulugetta, Y., Chioma, D.O., Perkins, P.E., Sanches Pereira, A., Weber, E.U. (2022). Demand, services, and social aspects of mitigation, Supplementary Material. In: IPCC, 2022: Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, R. Slade, A. Al Khourdajie, R. van Diemen, D. McCollum, M. Pathak, S. Some, P. Vyas, R. Fradera, M. Belkacemi, A. Hasija, G. Lisboa, S. Luz, J. Malley, (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA.
View PDF

⁽²⁰⁶⁾ Bosetti, V., Dennig, F., Liu, N., Tavoni, M., & Weber, E.U. (2022). Forward-looking belief elicitation enhances intergenerational beneficence. Environmental and Resource Economics. SSRN Working Paper 3648287 SSRN’s Top Ten download list for: AARN: Environmentalism (Sub-Topic), Consumer Social Responsibility eJournal, SRPN: Consumer Behavior Issues (Topic) and SRPN: Social Economics (Topic).
View PDF

⁽²⁰⁵⁾ Frey, R.*, Duncan, S.M.*, & Weber, E.U. (2022). Towards a typology of risk preference: Four risk profiles describe two thirds of individuals in a large and diverse sample of the U.S. Population. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. doi:10.31234/osf.io/yjwr9
View PDF

⁽²⁰⁴⁾ Krueger, E.*, Constantino, S. M.*, Centeno, M. A., Elmqvist, T., Levin, S., Weber, E. U. (2022). Governing sustainable transformations of urban social-ecological-technological systems. npj Urban Sustainability. doi: 10.1038/s42949-022-00053-1.
View PDF

⁽²⁰³⁾ Chapin, F.S., Weber, E.U., Bennett, E.M., Biggs, R., van den Bergh, J., Adger, N., Crépin, A.S., Polasky, S., Folke, C., Scheffer, M., Segerson, K., Anderies, J.M., Barrett, S., Cardenas, J.C., Carpenter, S., Fischer, J., Kautsky, N., Levin, S.A., Shogren, J.F., Walker, B., Wilen, J., de Zeeuw, A. (2022). Earth stewardship: Shaping sustainable futures through interacting policy and norm shifts. Ambio.
View PDF

⁽²⁰²⁾ Reeck, C.*, Gamma, K.*, & Weber, E.U. (2022). How we decide shapes what we choose: Decision modes predict consumer decisions about environmentally-friendly electrical utility rates and plans. In press, Theory and Decision.
View PDF

2021

⁽²⁰⁰⁾ Constantino, S. M.*, & Weber, E. U. (2021). Decision-making under the deep uncertainty of climate change: The psychological and political agency of narratives. Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.11.001
View PDF

⁽¹⁹⁹⁾ Schneider, C.R.* & Weber, E.U. Motivating prosocial behavior by leveraging positive self-regard through values affirmation (2021). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, http://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12841
View PDF

⁽¹⁹⁸⁾ Vasconcelos, V.*, Constantino, S.*, Dannenberg, A., Lumkowsky, M., Weber, E.U., & Levin, S. (2021). Segregation and clustering of preferences erode socially beneficial coordination. PNAS, 118.
View PDF

⁽¹⁹⁷⁾ Bak-Coleman, J.B., Alfano, M. Barfuss,W., Bergstom, C.T., Van Bavel, J., Centeno, M., Couzin, I., Donges, JF., Galesic, M., Gersick, A., Jacquet, J., Kao, A., Patterson, T., Romanczuk, P., Rubenstein, D., Tombak, K., & Weber, E.U. (2021). Stewardship of global collective behavior. PNAS, 118, 27, e2025764118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2025764118
View PDF

⁽¹⁹⁶⁾ Folke, C., Polasky, S., Rockström, J., Galaz, V., Westley, F., Lamont, M., Scheffer, M., Österblom, H., Carpenter, S., Chapin III, F.S., Seto, K., Weber, E., Crona, B., Daily, G., Dasgupta, P., Gaffney, O., Gordon, L., Hoff, H., Levin, S., Lubchenco, J., Steffen, W., and Walker, B. (2021). Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere. Ambio, 50, 834–869
View PDF

⁽¹⁹⁵⁾ Levin, S.A., Anderies, J.M., Adger, N., Barrett, S., Bennett, E.M., Biggs, R., Cardenas, J.C., Carpenter, S., Crépin, A.S., Dixit, A., Ehrlich, P., Fischer, J., Folke, C., Kautsky, N., Nyborg, K., Polasky, S., Scheffer, M., Segerson, K., Shogren, J.F., van den Bergh, J., Walker, B., Weber, E.U., Wilen, J. (2021). Governance in the Face of Extreme Events: Lessons from Evolutionary Processes for Structuring Interventions and the Need to Go Beyond. Ecosystems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-021-00680-2
View PDF

⁽¹⁹⁴⁾ van der Linden, S. & Weber, E.U. (2021). Editorial Overview: Can Behavioral Science Solve the Climate Crisis? Current Opinions in Behavioral Science.
View PDF

⁽¹⁹³⁾ Sparkman, G. *, Attari, S. *, & Weber, E.U. (2021). Moderating spillover: Focusing on personal sustainable behavior rarely hinders and can boost climate policy support. Energy Research & Social Science, 78.
View PDF

⁽¹⁹²⁾ Constantino, S. M. *, Schlüter, M., Weber, E. U., Wijermans, N. (2021). Cognition and behavior in context: a framework and theories to explain natural resource use decisions in social‑ecological systems. Sustainability Science, 16, 1651–1671.
View PDF

⁽¹⁹¹⁾ Constantino, S.M. *, Pianta, S. *, Rinscheid, A. *, Frey, R. *, & Weber, E.U. (2021). The source is the message: The impact of institutional signals on climate change-related norm perceptions and behaviors. Climatic Change, 166:35, 1-20, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03095-z
View PDF

⁽¹⁹⁰⁾ Pianta, S. *, Rinscheid, A. *, & Weber, E.U. (2021). Carbon capture and storage in the United States: Perceptions, preferences, and lessons for policy. Energy Policy, 151.
View PDF

⁽¹⁸⁹⁾ Reeck, C. *, Figner, B. *, Weber, E.U., Steffener, J.,Krosch, A. *, Wager, T.D., & Johnson, E. J. (2021). Framing the future first: Medial temporal lobe activation discriminates delay and acceleration framing in intertemporal choice. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 14, 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1037/npe0000122.
View PDF

⁽¹⁸⁸⁾ Forster, H.A. *, Kunreuther, H., & Weber, E.U. (2021). Planet or pocketbook? Environmental motives complement financial motives for energy efficiency across the political spectrum in the United States. Energy Research and Social Science, 74. www.sciencedirect.com
View PDF

2020

⁽¹⁸⁷⁾ Weber, E. U. (2020). Seeing is believing: Understanding and aiding human responses to global climate change. Daedalus, Fall issue on “Witnessing Professionals and Climate Change.” www.amacad.org

⁽¹⁸⁶⁾ Hardisty, D.J.* & Weber, E.U. (in press). Savoring and impatience vs. dread: Asymmetries in anticipation explain different consumer time preferences for positive vs. negative events. Journal of Consumer Research, 30 598-613. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1169

⁽¹⁸⁵⁾ Rinscheid, A., Pianta, S., & Weber, E.U. (2020). What shapes citizens’ preferences towards climate change policies? The role of social norms and elite cues. Behavioural Public Policy, Published online by Cambridge University Press, 3 November 2020. doi:10.1017/bpp.2020.43
View PDF

⁽¹⁸⁴⁾ Rinscheid, A., Pianta, S., & Weber, E. U. (2020). Fast track or Slo-Mo? Public support and temporal preferences for phasing out fossil fuel cars in the United States. Climate Policy, 20, 30-45. DOI
View PDF

⁽¹⁸³⁾ Jachimowicz, J. M.,* Szaszi, B., Prabhu, J., & Weber, E.U. (2020). Higher economic inequality intensifies the poor’s financial hardship by fraying the community buffer. Nature Human Behavior, 4 702-712.
View PDF

⁽¹⁸²⁾ Wall, D.,* Crookes, R.D.,* Johnson, E.J., & Weber, E.U. (2020). Risky choice frames shift the structure and emotional valence of internal arguments: A query theory account of the unusual disease problem, Judgment and Decision Making, 15, 685-703.
View PDF

⁽¹⁸¹⁾ Schneider, C. R., & Weber, E. U. (2020). Reducing Discrimination and Fostering Prosociality Towards Ex‐Prisoners in Nigeria and the United States. Journal of Social Issues, 76, 172-199. DOI
View PDF

2019

⁽¹⁸⁰⁾ Sisco, M. R., & Weber, E. U. (2019). Examining charitable giving in real-world online donations. Nature Communications, 10. DOI
View PDF

⁽¹⁷⁹⁾ Klotz, L., Pickering, J., Schmidt, R., & Weber, E.U. (2019). Design for sustainability. Nature Sustainability. View PDF

⁽¹⁷⁸⁾ Jachimowicz, J. M.,* Duncan, S.*, Johnson, E. J., & Weber, E.U. (2019). When and why defaults influence how people decide: A meta-analysis of default effects. Behavioral Public Policy. Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 January 2019. DOI. (SSRN’s Top Ten download list for: Cognitive Social Science eJournal, 4/12/2016, Behavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal, 3/19/2016, 4/3/2016, Social Responsibility of Business eJournals. 3/7/2016, Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets eJournal, 3/6/2016, CSN: Economics (Topic), 2/17/2016, Behavioral & Experimental Economics eJournal, Behavioral & Experimental Finance (Editor’s Choice) eJournal, Consumer Social Responsibility eJournal, ERN: Behavioral Finance (Microeconomics) (Topic), ERN: Experimental Economics (Topic) and SRPN: Consumer Behavior Issues (Topic), 2/16/2016)
View PDF

⁽¹⁷⁷⁾ Weber, E.U. (2019). Cognitive science of political thought: Some final reflections. Cognition, 188, 140.
View PDF

⁽¹⁷⁶⁾ Shealy, T.,* Klotz, L., Weber, E.U., Johnson, E.J., Bell, R.G. (2019). Bringing choice architecture to architecture and engineering decisions: How the redesign of rating systems can improve sustainability. Journal of Management in Engineering, 35(4), [04019014]. DOI
View PDF

⁽¹⁷⁵⁾ Attari, S.M.,* Krantz, D.H., & Weber, E. U. (2019). Statements about climate researchers’ carbon footprints affect their audiences’ policy support. Climatic Change, 154, 529–545. DOI.
View PDF

2018

⁽¹⁷³⁾ Bang, M.H.,* Shu, S.B.. & Weber, E.U. (2018). Informed Consent to Choice Architecture: The Role of Perceived Effectiveness on Acceptability. Behavioural Public Policy. Published online: 06 February 2018, pp. 1-21: DOI
View PDF

⁽¹⁷²⁾ Creutzig, F., Roy, J., Lamb, W.F., Azevedo, I.M.L., Bruine de Bruin, W., Dalkmann, H., Edelenbosch, O.Y., Geels, F.W., Grübler, A., Hepburn, C., Hertwich, E., Khosla, R., Mattauch, L., Minx, J.C., Ramakrishnan, A., Rao, N., Steinberger, J., Tavoni, M., Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Weber, E.U. (2018) Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change. Nature Climate Change, 8, 260-263.

⁽¹⁷¹⁾ Weber, E. U. (2018). “Risk as Feelings” and “Perception Matters: ”Psychological contributions on risk, risk taking and risk management. In: Kunreuther, H., Meyer, R., & E. Michel-Kerjan, The Future of Risk and Risk Management. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
View PDF

⁽¹⁷⁰⁾ Klotz, L., Weber, E.U., Johnson, E.J., Shealy, T.,* Hernandez, M., & Gordon, M. (2018). Beyond rationality in engineering design for sustainability. Nature Sustainability, 1, 225-233.
View PDF

⁽¹⁶⁹⁾ Weber, E.U. (2018). Perception matters: The pitfalls of misperceiving psychological barriers to climate policy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 508-511. DOI
View PDF

⁽¹⁶⁸⁾ Weber. E.U. (2018). Combine and conquer: A paean to methodological pluralism. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7, 29-32.

2017

⁽¹⁶⁷⁾ van der Linden, S., Maibach, E., Cook, J. et al. Culture versus cognition is a false dilemma. Nature Climate Change, 7, 457 (2017). www.nature.com

⁽¹⁶⁵⁾ Weber, E.U. (2017). Breaking cognitive barriers to a sustainable future. Nature Human Behavior (published online 1/16/2017: www.nature.com

⁽¹⁶⁰⁾ Yoeli, E., Budescu, D.V., Carrico, A.R., Delmas, M.A., DeShazo, J.R., Ferraro, P.J., Forster, H.A.,* Kunreuther, H., Larrick, R.P., Lubell, M., Markowitz, E.M., Tonn, T., Vandenbergh, M.P. &Weber, E.U. (2017). Behavioral science tools for energy and environmental policy. Behavioral Science and Policy, 3, 69–79.
View PDF

⁽¹⁵⁸⁾ Schneider, C.R.,* Zaval, L.,* Weber, E.U. & Markowitz, E.M. (2017). The influence of anticipated pride and guilt on environmental decision making. PLoS One, 12(11): e0188781. DOI
View PDF

⁽¹⁵⁷⁾ Majd, S.*, Conley, M.A., and Weber, E. (2017). Evidence of query theory as tool to assist restrained eaters. American Journal of Health Behaviors, 41 33-41.

2016

⁽¹⁵³⁾ Attari, S., M.,* Weber, E.U., & Krantz, D.H. (2016). Energy conservation goals: What people adopt, what they recommend, and why. Judgment and Decision Making, 11, 342-351.
View PDF

⁽¹⁵¹⁾ Bouin, O., Djelic, M.L., Fleurbaey, M., Kanbur, R., Laborde, C., Nowotny, H., Reis, E., Weber, E.U., Zhang, X. (2016). International Panel on Social Progress seeks comments. Nature, 534, 616-617.
View PDF

2015

⁽¹⁴⁶⁾ Figner, B.,* & Weber, E.U. (2015). Personality and risk taking. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, 17, 809-813.
View PDF

⁽¹⁴⁵⁾ Weber, E.U. (2015). Climate change demands behavioral change: What are the challenges? Social Research: An International Quarterly, 82, 561-581.
View PDF

⁽¹⁴³⁾ Zaval, L.,* Markowitz, E.M., & Weber, E.U. (2015). How will I be remembered? Conserving the environment for legacy’s sake. Psychological Science, 26, 231-236.
View PDF

⁽¹⁴¹⁾ Zaval, L.,* Li, Y.,* Johnson, E.J., & Weber, E.U. (2015). Complementary contributions of fluid and crystallized intelligence to decision making across the life span. In: Aging and Decision Making: Empirical and Applied Perspectives (pp. 149-168) (Hess, T., Strough, J.N., Loeckenhoff, C., Eds.), Elsevier.
View PDF

2014

⁽¹⁴²⁾ Truelove, H.B., Carrico, A. R., Weber, E.U., Raimi, K.T., & Vandenbergh, M.P. (2014). Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework. Global Environmental Change, 29, 127-138.
View PDF

⁽¹³⁸⁾ Kenning, P., Weber, E.U., & Welpe, I. (2014). The brain in business research, Schmalenbach Business Research, Special Issue 5/14, 1-6.

⁽¹³⁵⁾ Attari, S.,* M., Krantz, D.H., & Weber, E.U. (2014). Reasons for cooperation or defection in real-world social dilemmas. Judgment and Decision Making, 9, 316-334.
View PDF

2013

⁽¹³²⁾ Weber, E.U. (2013). Individual and collective behavior change. World Social Science Report 2013 Changing Global Environments, pp. 306-311.
View PDF

⁽¹²⁷⁾ Weber, E.U. (2013). Seeing is believing. Nature Climate Change, 3, 312-313.
View PDF

⁽¹²⁵⁾ Weber, M., & Weber E.U., & Nosić, A. (2013). Determinants of changes in investor risk taking. Review of Finance, 17, 847-883 (listed on 12/30/2010 as SSRN’s Top Ten download for ERN: Search; Learning; Information Costs & Specific Knowledge; Expectation & Speculations Top Ten).
View PDF

⁽¹²³⁾ Markiewicz, L.,* & Weber, E.U. (2013). DOSPERT’s gambling risk-taking scale predicts excessive stock trading. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 14, 1-14.
View PDF

2012

⁽¹¹⁴⁾ Ames, D. R., Weber, E.U., & Zou, X.* (2012). Mind-reading in strategic interaction: The impact of perceived similarity on projection and stereotyping. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 96-110.
View PDF

2011

⁽¹¹¹⁾ Bert F., G.P. Podestá, S. Rovere, A. Menéndez, M., North, E. Tatara, C. E. Laciana, E. Weber, and F. Ruiz Toranzo. (2011). An agent-based model to simulate structural and land use changes in agricultural systems of the Argentine pampas. Ecological Modelling, 222, 3486-3499.
View PDF

⁽¹⁰⁹⁾ Weber, E.U. (2011). Climate change hits home. Nature Climate Change, 1, 25-26. doi:10.1038/nclimate1070.
View PDF

⁽¹⁰⁸⁾ Weber, E.U. & Stern, P. (2011). The American public’s understanding of climate change. American Psychologist, 66, 315-328. doi: 10.1037/a0023253
View PDF

⁽¹⁰⁷⁾ Weber, E.U., & Johnson, E. J. (2011). Query Theory: Knowing what we want by arguing with ourselves. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 91-92. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10002797.
View PDF

⁽¹⁰¹⁾ Weber, E. U. & Ancker, J. S.* (2011). Cultural differences in risk taking and precaution: The relative roles of risk perception and risk attitude In J.B. Wiener, M.D. Rogers, P.H. Sand, and J.K. Hammitt (Eds.), The Reality of Precaution: Comparing Risk Regulation in the United States and Europe (pp. 480-491). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
View PDF

2010

⁽⁹⁹⁾ Weber, E.U. (2010). What shapes perceptions of climate change? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(3), 332-342. doi: 10.1002/wcc.41.
View PDF

⁽⁹⁷⁾ Figner, B.,* Knoch, D., Johnson, E.J., Krosch, A.R.,* Lisanby, S.H., Fehr, E., and Weber, E.U. (2010). Lateral prefrontal cortex and self-control in intertemporal choice. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 538-539. doi:10.1038/nn.2516 (Listed on SSRN’s Top Ten download list for: CSN: Modeling & Simulation (Topic), 1/16/2017, BRN Cognitive Neuroscience (Biology) (Topic), 2/9/2017, 4/7/2017, 5/31/2017).
View PDF

⁽⁹⁴⁾ Weber, E.U. (2010). Risk attitude and preference. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1, 79-88. doi: 10.1002/wcs.5
View PDF

2009

⁽⁹²⁾ Letson, D., Laciana, C. E., Bert, F., Weber, E. U., Katz, R.W., Gonzalez, X.I., & Podesta, G. (2009). Value of perfect ENSO phase predictions for agriculture: Evaluating the impact of land tenure and decision objectives. Climatic Change, 97, 145-170. doi: 10.1007/s10584-009-9600-8.
View PDF

⁽⁹⁰⁾ Weber, E.U. (2009). Risk Attitudes. In Kattan, M.W. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Medical Decision Making (pp. 992-994). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

⁽⁸⁹⁾ Weber, E.U. (2009). Risk Perception. In Kattan, M.W. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Medical Decision Making (pp. 996-1001). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

⁽⁸⁸⁾ Hardisty, D.H.,* & Weber, E.U. (2009). Discounting future green: Money vs. the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 3, 329-340 (listed on 10/01/2009 as SSRN’s Top Ten download for ERN: Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate (Topic) Top Ten Top Ten, and on 12/30/2010 as SSRN’s Top Ten download for ERN: Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate) Top Ten. doi: 10.1037/a0016433.
View PDF

⁽⁸⁶⁾ Weber, E.U. (2009). Book Review of “Your Money and Your Brain: How the New Science of Neuroeconomics Can Help Make You Rich,” by Jason Zweig. Simon & Schuster. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 8, 252-253. doi:10.1017/S1474747208003508.
View PDF

⁽⁸⁵⁾ Higgins, E.T., Weber, E.U., & Grant, H. (2009). Part IV: Psychology. In A. Gelman & J. Cortina (Eds.), Quantitative Models and Methods: A Tour of the Social Sciences (pp. 271-302). Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

⁽⁸²⁾ Figner, B.,* Mackinlay, R.J., Wilkening F., & Weber, E.U. (2009). Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: Age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 709-730. doi: 10.1037/a0014983.
View PDF

2008

2007

⁽⁷⁶⁾ Engel, C., & Weber, E.U. (2007). The impact of institutions on the decision of how to decide. Journal of Institutional Economics, 3, 323-349. doi: 10.1017/S1744137407000744.
View PDF

⁽⁷⁵⁾ Weber, E.U., Johnson, E.J., Milch, K.,* Chang, H., Brodscholl, J.,* & Goldstein, D.* (2007). Asymmetric discounting in intertemporal choice: A query theory account. Psychological Science, 18, 516-523. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01932.
View PDF

2006

⁽⁷²⁾ Blais, A.-R.,* & Weber, E.U. (2006). A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 33-47.
View PDF

⁽⁶⁸⁾ Goldstein, D.G.,* Arkes, H.R., Beckenkam, M., Cooter, R., Ellickson, R. C., Engel, C., Guthrie, C., Hertwig, R., Kurzenhaeuser, S., & Weber, E.U. (2006). How do heuristics mediate the impact of the law on behavior? (pp. 439-465) In Gigerenzer, G. & Engel, C., Heuristics and the Law. Oxford University Press.
View PDF

⁽⁶⁷⁾ Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E.U., & Erev, I. (2006). Rare risky prospects: Different when valued through a window of sampled experiences. In K. Fiedler & P. Juslin (Eds.), Information sampling as a key to understanding adaptive cognition in an uncertain environment. (pp. 72-91). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

2005

⁽⁶⁶⁾ Weber, E.U. & Ancker, J.S.* (2005). Towards a taxonomy of modes of moral decision making. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 563-564. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X05440091.
View PDF

2004

⁽⁶²⁾ Weber, E.U., Shafir, S., & Blais, A.-R.* (2004). Predicting risk-sensitivity in humans and lower animals: Risk as variance or coefficient of variation. Psychological Review, 111, 430-445. doi: 10.1037/0033-295×.111.2.430.
View PDF

⁽⁵⁹⁾ Nunes, J.C., Hsee, C.K., & Weber, E.U. (2004). The effect of cost structure on consumer purchase and payment intentions. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 23, 43-53.
View PDF

2003

2002

2001

⁽⁵²⁾ Blais, A.-R.,* & Weber, E.U. (2001). Domain-specificity and gender differences in decision making. Risk Decision and Policy, 6, 47-69. doi: 10.1017/S1357530901000254.
View PDF

2000

⁽⁵⁰⁾ Weber, E.U., Böckenholt, U., Hilton, D.J., & Wallace, B. (2000). Confidence judgments as expressions of experienced decision conflict. Risk Decision and Policy, 5, 1-32.
View PDF

1999

⁽⁴⁷⁾ Munier, B., Selten, R., Bouyssou, D., Bourgine, P., Day, R., Harvey, N., Hilton, D., Machina, M., Parker, Ph., Sterman, J., Weber, E.U., Wernerfelt, B., & Wensley, R. (1999). Bounded rationality modeling. Marketing Letters, 13, 103-135. doi: 10.1023/A:1008058417088 (Listed on SSRN’s Top Ten download list for: Université Paris-Dauphine Research Papers Series, 6/15/2015.)
View PDF

⁽⁴⁶⁾ Weber, E.U. (1999). Giving mathematical psychology away: Challenges and promises. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 43, 197-200. doi: 10.1006/jmps.1999.1255.
View PDF

⁽⁴³⁾ Weber, E.U. (1999). Commentary on “Analysis of Choice Expectations in Incomplete Scenarios.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 71-72. doi: 10.1023/A:1007811023785.
View PDF

1998

⁽³⁹⁾ Tada, Y.* & Weber, E.U. (1998). Representing psychological dimensions of decisions: Implications for behavioral decision models. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1049-1054). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
View PDF

1997

1996

⁽³²⁾ Weber, E.U. & Kirsner, B.* (1996). Reasons for rank-dependent utility evaluation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14, 41-61. doi: 10.1023/A:1007769703493.
View PDF

1995

⁽³⁰⁾ Mellers, B.A., Weber, E.U., Ordónez, L.D., & Cooke, A.D. (1995). Utility invariance despite labile preferences. In J. R. Busemeyer, R. Hastie, D. L. Medin (Eds.) Decision Making from a Cognitive Perspective. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 32 (pp. 22 1-246). San Diego: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60311-4.
View PDF

1994

⁽²⁷⁾ Weber, E.U. (1994). Behavioral decision theory: Insights and applications. In B. H. Jacobsen, D. F. Pedersen, J. Christensen, & S. Rasmussen (Eds.), Farmers’ Decision Making: A Descriptive Approach (pp. 13-30). Copenhagen, Denmark: European Association of Agricultural Economists.
View PDF

⁽²⁵⁾ Weber, E.U. & Sonka, S. (1994). Production and pricing decisions in cash-crop farming: Effects of decision traits and climate change expectations. In B. H. Jacobsen, D. F. Pedersen, J. Christensen, & S. Rasmussen (Eds.), Farmers’ Decision Making: A Descriptive Approach (pp. 203-218). Copenhagen, Denmark: European Association of Agricultural Economists.
View PDF

1993

⁽²⁴⁾ Holtgrave, D.* & Weber, E.U. (1993). Dimensions of risk perception for financial and health risks. Risk Analysis, 13, 553-558. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb00014.x.
View PDF

⁽²³⁾ Böckenholt, U. & Weber, E.U. (1993). Toward a theory of hypothesis generation in diagnostic decision making. Investigative Radiology, 28, 76-80.

1992

⁽²⁰⁾ Weber, E.U. & Böckenholt, U. (1992). A conflict model of confidence. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 30, 484.

⁽¹⁹⁾ Weber, E.U., Böckenholt, U., Hilton, D.J., & Wallace, B. (1992). Determinants of initial hypotheses in medical diagnosis. International Journal of Psychology, 27, 171. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.19.5.1151.

1991

1990

⁽¹⁵⁾ Weber, E.U. & Hilton, D.J. (1990). Contextual effects in the interpretations of probability words: Perceived base rate and severity of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 781-789. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.16.4.781.
View PDF

1989

⁽¹¹⁾ Weber, E.U. (1989). A behavioral approach to decision making under uncertainty: Implications and lessons for expected utility theory. Proceedings of the USDA Economic Research Service: Southern Regional Risk Project, 4, 25-3 5.

⁽¹⁰⁾ Weber, E.U. (1989). Review of ‘Statistics Explained: Basic Concepts and Methods’ by R. Kapadia and G. Andersson._ Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89_, 349-350.
View PDF

⁽⁹⁾ Coskunoglu, O. & Weber, E.U. (1989). A synthesis of descriptive and prescriptive models for decision making. In M. C. Jackson (Ed.), Operational Research and the Social Sciences, Vol. II. Plenum Press.
View PDF

1988

⁽⁷⁾ Weber, E.U. (1988). A descriptive measure of risk. Acta Psychologica, 69, 185-203. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(88)90006-6.
View PDF

1987

⁽⁶⁾ Weber, E.U. (1987). Decision analysis manual in search of a reader: Review of The anatomy of decision by Mirek Karasek. Contemporary Psychology, 32, 71.

⁽⁵⁾ Weber, E.U. (1987). Review of Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand by Moshe Ben-Akiva and Steven R. Lerman. Journal of Classification, 4, 125-128. doi: 10.1007/BF01890079

1986

⁽⁴⁾ Luce, R.D., & Weber, E.U. (1986). An axiomatic theory of conjoint, expected risk. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 30, 188-205. doi: 10.1016/0022-2496(86)90013-1
View PDF

1985

⁽³⁾ Weber, E.U. (1985). Managing a low-incidence risk: The example of toxic shock syndrome. Risk Analysis, 5, 73-84. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1985.tb00153.x
View PDF

1984

1981

⁽¹⁾ Ono, H., & Weber, E.U. (1981). Nonveridical visual direction produced by monocular viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 937-947. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.7.5.937
View PDF

Books and Project Reports

Klimaneutralität: Optionen für eine ambitionierte Weichenstellung und Umsetzung (Climate neutrality: Options for ambitiously laying the foundations and for realization). Positionpapier des Rates fuer Nachhaltige Entwicklung der deutschen Regierung und der Leopoldina (Position paper of the Sustainability Council of the German Government and the German National Academy of Science Leopoldina), June 2021. www.leopoldina.org

Connecticut Academy of Science and Engineering, Inc. (May 29, 2020). An Adaptive Risk-Based Strategy for Connecticut’s Ongoing COVID-19 Response [White Paper]. Retrieved from www.ctcase.org

Klotz, L., Pickering, J., Weber, E. U. (Panel Co-Chairs) (2019). Twenty Questions about Design Behavior for Sustainability. Report of the International Expert Panel on Behavioral Science for Design, New York.

Chandy, R., Dowell, G., Mayer, C., Plambeck, E., Serafeim, G., Toffel, M., Toktay, B., Weber, E. (2019). Call for Papers: Management Science—Special Issue on Business and Climate Change. Management Science Articles in Advance, 1–2. pubsonline.informs.org ISSN 0025-1909 (print), ISSN 1526-5501 (online)

Sloman, S. & Weber, E.U. (2019). The Cognitive Science of Political Thought. Volume 188. July 2019. Special Issue of Cognition.

Keleş, D., Fleury, M., Golev, O., & Weber, E. U. (2019). Understanding Shared Social Norms for Adoption of Offshore Wind Energy in the State of New Jersey. Report for the Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment and Princeton Environmental Institute. Behavioral Science for Policy Lab, Princeton University.
View PDF

Weber, E. U. & Klement, J. (2018). Risk tolerance and circumstances. Research Foundation Brief for the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) Institute.
View PDF

Bowman, T. (2016). Toward Consensus on the Climate Communication Challenge: Report from a Dialogue of Researchers and Practitioners. Bowman Change, Inc.
Read more

Kenning, P., Weber, E., & Welpe, I. (2014). Neuroeoconomics. Special Issue of Schmalenbach Business Research, 5/14.

Ancker, J. S. & Weber, E. U. (2005). Moral and ethical decision making: A review. Report for Defence R&D Canada, Toronto. Center for the Decision Sciences, Columbia University.

Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Stern P. C., Stonich, S., & Weber, E. U. (Eds.) (2002). The Drama of the Commons. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press.

Weber, E. U., Baron, J., & Loomes, G. (Eds.) (2001). Conflict and Tradeoffs in Decision Making. Cambridge University Press.

National Research Council Report, Making Climate Forecasts Matter, Stern, P. C., & Easterling, W. E. (Eds.), (1999), Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Weber, E. U. (1983). Study Guide for Principles of Statistics by Paul A. Herzberg. New York: Wiley.

Herzberg, P. A., & Weber, E. U. (1983). Instructors Manual for Principles of Statistics. New York: Wiley.

Popular Media

Weber, E. U. (2020). Heads in the Sand: Why We Fail to Foresee and Contain Catastrophe. Foreign Affairs, Nov/Dec.

Weber, E.U. (2020). Giving the Future a Chance: Behavioral Economic Responses to the Dual Challenges of COVID-19 and the Climate Crisis. In A. Samson (Ed.), Behavioral Economics Guide 2020 (pp. 2-13). Retrieved from www.behavioraleconomics.com

Weber, E.U. (2020). EES Perspective: Engineering and Ethics in the Anthropocene. The Bridge, National Academy of Engineering, Invited Editorial, Spring 2020 (pp. 68-72).

Loewenstein, G. Weber, E.U. (2020). How to get through to your risk-taking friends in a COVID-19 pandemic. LA Times, Op-Ed, Sept. 13, 2020. www.latimes.com

Rinscheid, A., Pianta, S., Weber., E.U. & Wüstenhagen, R. (2019). On both sides of the Atlantic, citizens are more impatient on climate policy action than their politicians. Climate Strategies/Climate Policy Blog, Dec. 17, 2019. climatestrategies.wordpress.com

Sloman, S.A. & Weber, E.U. (2019). The cognitive science of political thought: Practical take-aways for political discourse. Behavioral Scientist, September 2019. behavioralscientist.org

Jachimowicz, J.M., Duncan, S., Weber, E.U., & Johnson, E. J. (2019). Defaults are not the same by default. Behavioral Scientist, April 2019. behavioralscientist.org

Weber, E.U. (2018). Contribution to Association for Psychological Science (APS) Monitor article, Firm foundations: What are the most-replicated studies in psychological science? Weber section is on “Choice Defaults.” www.psychologicalscience.org

Weber, E. U. (2017). Save the baby in the bathwater: A review of ‘Motivated Numeracy and Enlightened Self-Government’ by Dan Kahan, Ellen Peters, Erica Dawson and Paul Slovic, for Behavioural Public Policy. Behaviour and Public Policy (BPP) Blog, June 1, 2017. bppblog.com

Weber, E.U. (2017). A Safe and Magical Place to Agree and Disagree (About Climate Action). In: Studio Olafur Eliasson – Open House (EN) (pp. 127-130). Berlin, Germany: Studio Olafur Eliasson.

Jachimowicz, J. M., Weber, E.U., & Prabhu, J., & (2017). The conditions that help poor people make better decisions, according to new research. Quartz, online publication May 3, 2017: qz.com

Johnson, E.J., & Weber, E.U. (2017). Making America agree again: Two business school professors discovered how to make both red and blue Americans care about Trump’s drastic budget cuts. Quartz, online publication March 16, 2017: qz.com

Shealy, T. & Weber, E.U. (2014). Opinion: We can build a better climate solution today. The Daily Climate, Nov. 12, 2014: www.dailyclimate.org

Weber, E., Bauman, I., & Eliasson, O. (2014) Can art inspire climate change action? An ice installation aims to do just that. Guardian Professional, Thursday 23 October 2014: www.theguardian.com

Weber, E.U. & Bell, R. B. (2014). Focus on the habits: Applying behavioral insights to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Boao Review, July 2014. (English version and Chinese version)

Bell, R. B. & Weber, E.U. (2014). Opinion: We’re leaving too many energy dollars behind us, on the ground. The Daily Climate, May 19, 2014: www.dailyclimate.org

Hershfield, H.E & Weber, E.U. (2013). To Change Environmental Behavior, Should We Really Tell People the World Is Ending? Huffington Post, 09/03/2013: www.huffingtonpost.com

Weber, E.U. (2013). How can psychologists help make Earth Day every day? Behavioral Expert Elke Weber, PhD, Discusses Psychology and Environmental Protection. American Psychological Association Website, www.apa.org

Weber, E. U. (2006). The Determinants of Risk Taking. Transcript and Webcast of Invited Presentation, Thought Leader Forum, Legg Mason Capital Management, Baltimore MD, September 28, 2006. www.leggmason.com

Weber, E. U. (2003). Origins and functions of perceptions of risk. Transcript of Invited Presentation, National Cancer Institute (NCI) Workshop Conceptualizing and Measuring Risk Perceptions, February 13, 2003. dccps.nci.nih.gov

Weber, E. U. (2003). Objetivos y emociones en la toma de decisión. Suplemento de la edición No. 269 de la Revista CREA, Uso de informacion climatica: Para la toma de decisiones en la produccion agricola (p. 7).